Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

The First Commandment

Posted on Mar 10th, 2009 by Faith : Wild Child Faith
Weblink:http://www.missiontoisrael.org/first-commandment.php
Thou shalt have no other gods before me. (Exodus 20:3 1)

Of First Importance
In both ancient and contemporary history, Israel's2 defiance of her God is ultimately traced to First Commandment transgression. Israel flagrantly broke and continues to break Yahweh's other commandments, but this rebellion always finds its root cause in placing other gods before Him.
When man places another god before Yahweh, that god becomes his lord or master. These gods exact lordship by imposing laws and requiring obedience. Yeshua3 explains this relationship:

...why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say [command]? (Luke 6:46)
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity [lawlessness NASV]. (Matthew 7:21-23)

Whoever is god in a person's life inevitably determines the laws by which he lives. When Yahweh has been made lord of someone's life, their innermost desire becomes one of obeying His commandments and statutes. There is no such motivation for the person who has rejected Yahweh as his God. Thus, out of all of the Ten Commandments, the First Commandment is the most consequential.

Pluralism
At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Benjamin Franklin urged his fellow participants to call upon the "God [who] governs in the affairs of man." Although he did not refer to Him by His name, Yahweh, there was no ambiguity as to which God he was referring. Mr. Franklin went on to advise his compatriots:

I therefore beg leave to move that, henceforth, prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessing on our deliberation be held in this assembly every morning before we proceed to business....4

How far we have fallen was vividly evidenced when on June 25, 1991, at the recommendation of Congressman Nick Rahall (Democrat, West Virginia), Congress called upon a Black Muslim to offer prayer to Allah on behalf of American affairs. This was a giant step in America's departure from Yahweh, a defection that will not go unpunished.
A contrast of America's early history (whose citizens generally served Yahweh and observed His commandments) with contemporary America (whose citizens generally serve other gods and transgress Yahweh's commandments) reveals that rather than being blessed, America is being cursed as prophesied in Deuteronomy 28.
Many well meaning non-Christians and Christians alike have been brainwashed into believing that a pluralistic society was the intent and aim of America's founding fathers. Such people have fallen prey to intense anti-Christian propaganda. An honest person needs only to read this country's founding charters and documents to ascertain that our nation was established upon the Christian Bible and the laws of Yahweh. The term "freedom of religion," so often employed by America's forefathers, meant something altogether different from how those promoting pluralism today use the same term. To those who founded this great nation, "freedom of religion" meant "freedom of Christianity," with no tolerance for non-Christian religions or their gods. Consider the following declarations from some of America's early pastors quoted by John Wingate Thornton in his introduction to The Pulpit of the American Revolution:

[Pastor] John Norton, in the Election Sermon of 1661, said that they [America's early settlers] came "into this wilderness to live under the order of the [Christian] gospel;" "that our polity [government] may be a gospel polity, and may be compleat according to the Scriptures, answering fully the Word of God: this is the work of our generation, and the very work we engaged for into this wilderness; this is the scope and the end of it ... written upon the forehead of New England ... the compleat walking in the faith of the gospel, according to the order of the gospel."
The venerable [John] Higginson, of Salem, in his Election Sermon of 1663, stated ... "It concerneth New England always to remember that they are originally a plantation religious, not a plantation of trade.... Let merchants ... remember this: that worldly gain was not the end and design of the people of New England, but [the Christian] religion...."
In the [Harvard University] election Sermon of 1677 ... [Pastor] Increase Mather uttered these words; "It was love to God and to Jesus Christ which brought our fathers into this wilderness.... There never was a generation that did so perfectly shake off the dust of Babylon, both as to ecclesiastical and civil constitutions, as the first generation of Christians that came into this land for the gospel's sake...."5

In Magnalia Christi Americana, Cotton Mather, one of Boston's early ministers, testified to the same:

I WRITE the WONDERS of the CHRISTIAN RELIGION [Mather's capitalization] flying from the [religious] depravations of Europe, to the American Strand....6
In the year 1643 ... several colonies of New-England became in fact, as well as name, UNITED COLONIES [Mather's capitalization]. ...having declared, "That we all came into these parts of America with the same end and aim - namely, to advance the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ, and enjoy the liberties of the gospel...."7
The design of these [European] refugees, thus carried into the [North American] wilderness, was, that they might there "sacrifice unto the Lord their God:" it was, that they might maintain the power of godliness and practice the evangelical worship of our Lord Jesus Christ, in all the parts of it....8

On December 22, 1820 Daniel Webster quoted the Puritans' aim and design upon landing at Plymouth Rock, and in so doing, reminded his audience of this nation's early Christian character and intent:

...if God prosper us, we shall here begin a work which shall last for ages; we shall plant here a new society, in the principles of the fullest liberty and the purest religion ... we shall fill this region of the great [North American] continent ... with civilization and Christianity; the temples of the true God [Yahweh] shall rise, where now ascends the smoke of [non-Christian] idolatrous sacrifice....9
Finally, let us not forget the religious character of our origin. Our [European] fathers were brought hither by their high veneration for the Christian religion. They journeyed by its light, and labored in its hope. They sought to incorporate its principles with the elements of their society, and to diffuse its influence through all their institutions, civil, political, or literary. Let us cherish these sentiments, and extend this influence still more widely; in the full conviction, that that is the happiest society which partakes in the highest degree of the mild and peaceful spirit of Christianity. 10

America's Christian foundations and designs could not be affirmed more emphatically than they were by Patrick Henry:

It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians, not on religions but on the gospel of Jesus Christ!11

There have been three Supreme Court decisions [Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457 at 471 (1892), Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 307 at 313 (1952), and McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 at 561 (1961)] declaring that the United States of America is a Christian nation. In an address at Harvard University in 1905, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice, David J. Brewer, quoted from Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States:

This Republic is classified among the Christian nations of the world. It was so formally declared by the Supreme Court of the United States. In the case of HOLY TRINITY vs. UNITED STATES ... that Court ... added, "these and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation...."12

Justice Brewer went on to further establish this undeniable fact of American history:

In several colonies and States a profession of the Christian faith was made an indispensable condition to holding office. ...of still more significance ... there are no contrary declarations. In no charter or constitution is there anything to even suggest that any other than the Christian is the religion of this country. In none of them is Mohammed, or Confucius, or Buddha in any manner noticed. ...there is no charter or constitution [in America] that is either infidel, agnostic or anti-Christian.13

In the 1811 court case of People v. Ruggles, New York's Chancellor James Kent rendered a similar opinion:

Nor are we bound ... in the [United States] constitution, as some have strangely supposed, either not to punish at all, or to punish indiscriminately the like attacks [of blasphemy] upon the religion of Mohomet [Islam], or of the Grand Lama [Buddhism], and for this plain reason, that the case assumes that we are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply ingrafted upon Christianity and not upon the doctrines or worship of those imposters."14

The French Historian Alexis de Tocqueville in his momentous history of America, Democracy in America, testified to just how emphatic early American legislators were in their allegiance to Yahweh and their intolerance of false gods and non-Christian religions:

The legislators of Connecticut begin with the penal laws, and ... borrow their provisions from the text of Holy Writ. "Whosoever shall worship any other God than the Lord [Yahweh]," says the preamble of the Code, "shall surely be put to death."15

Had the intent of America's founding fathers been polytheistic it would not have mattered because Yahweh's design for America has always been monotheistic. Otherwise, Yahweh Himself would have been fostering first commandment transgression. The pluralism being advocated by today's secularists and many Christians alike cannot be found in either the Old or New Testament. Instead, Moses sternly warned the Israelites against polytheism.

Thou shalt fear YHWH16 thy God, and serve him, and shalt swear by his name. Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the people which are round about you; (For YHWH thy God is a jealous God among you) lest the anger of YHWH thy God be kindled against thee, and destroy thee from off the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy 6:13-15)

Additionally, Yeshua admonished us:

...Thou shalt worship YHWH thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. (Matthew 4:10)
...I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. (John 14:6)

Yahweh is indeed a God of love and mercy; but do not be mistaken, Yahweh can also be jealous and intolerant. Consider carefully the following admonitions:

But those mine [Yeshua's] enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. (Luke 19:27)
Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith YHWH. And again, YHWH shall judge his people. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. (Hebrews 10:29-31)
...our God is a consuming fire. (Hebrews 12:29)

Yahweh is uncompromising and intolerant when it comes to the worship of other gods, and He expects His people to be the same. He expects His followers to drive out or eliminate the worship of all false gods from their land:

...ye [Israel] shall destroy their [the heathen's] altars, break their images, and cut down their groves: For thou shalt worship no other god: for YHWH, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. (Exodus 34:13-14)
...ye [Israel] shall drive out all the [heathen] inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures [figured stones NASV], and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down [demolish NASV] all their high places. (Numbers 33:52)
...ye [Israel] shall overthrow their [the heathen's] altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place. (Deuteronomy 12:3)

Consequently, when America, as a nation, returns to Yahweh and His laws, the synagogues, mosques and the temples of other gods found throughout our land will have to come down.

Storming the Gates of Hell
With the previous scriptures readily available, why was it that America's preachers did not storm "the gates of hell" on June 25, 1991 when Congress allowed prayer to be offered to Allah on behalf of this nation? Perhaps, because they have become "dumb dogs unable to bark" in fulfillment of Isaiah 56:10-11 as a consequence of rejecting the laws of Yahweh.
The first mistake made by congress, preachers and Christians in general was in permitting Muslims (and adherents of other non-Christian religions) to reside in our land. That prayer to Allah was simply the consequence of a prior first commandment transgression:

Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor with their gods. They [non-Israelite heathens - verses 23-28] shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee. (Exodus 23:32-33)

A natural outgrowth of such first commandment violation is the election of foreigners as rulers over us. Yahweh does not tolerate this aberration either:

Thou [Israel] shalt ... set him king [or ruler] over thee, whom YHWH thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a [non-Israelite] stranger over thee, which is not thy brother [Israelite kindred]. (Deuteronomy 17:15)

With this in mind, it should not surprise anyone to discover that Congressman Nick Rahall is half-Lebanese.

First Commandment Statutes
Yahweh's law consists of three integral components:

...these are the commandments, the statutes, and the judgments, which YHWH your God commanded to teach you, that ye [Israel] might do them in the land whither ye go to possess it. (Deuteronomy 6:1)

Consequently, a thorough study of the first commandment requires that its statutes and judgment be examined as well. The following statutes specify and elucidate first commandment transgression.

Fear

...these are the commandments, the statutes, and the judgments, which YHWH your God commanded to teach you, that ye might do them ... that thou mightest fear YHWH thy God, to keep all his statutes and his commandments ... all the days of thy life; and that thy days may be prolonged. ...Thou shalt fear YHWH thy God, and serve him, and shalt swear by his name. Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the people which are round about you.... And YHWH commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear YHWH our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive, as it is at this day. (Deuteronomy 6:1-24)

Not only is the fear of Yahweh the beginning of knowledge and wisdom (Proverbs 1:7; 9:10), but it also determines whether Yahweh is our god. Whom a person fears is almost always whom he obeys, and one's obedience is the primary determinant in demonstrating who is his god. Thus, Yahweh demands that we fear only Him:

...therefore fear YHWH, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served.... (Joshua 24:14)
...I said unto you, I am YHWH your God; fear not the gods of the Amorites .... (Judges 6:10)
...YHWH commanded the children of Jacob, whom he named Israel; with whom YHWH had made a covenant, and charged them, saying, Ye shall not fear other gods, nor bow yourselves to them, nor serve them, nor sacrifice to them: But YHWH ... him shall ye fear, and him shall ye worship, and to him shall ye do sacrifice. And the statutes, and the ordinances, and the law, and the commandment, which he wrote for you, ye shall observe to do for evermore; and ye shall not fear other gods. And the covenant that I have made with you ye shall not forget; neither shall ye fear other gods. But YHWH your God ye shall fear; and he shall deliver you out of the hand of all your enemies. (2 Kings 17:34-39)

Additionally, we are not to fear men, men's governments, the media or any other man-made entity:

The fear of man bringeth a snare: but whoso putteth his trust in YHWH shall be safe. (Proverbs 29:25)
YHWH is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? YHWH is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid? ...Though an host should encamp against me, my heart shall not fear: though war should rise against me, in this [in Yahweh] will I be confident. (Psalm 27:1-3)
...YHWH spoke to me with mighty power and instructed me not to walk in the way of this people, saying, "You are not to say, 'It is a conspiracy!' In regard to all that this people call a conspiracy, and you are not to fear what they fear or be in dread of it. "It is YHWH of hosts whom you should regard as holy. And He shall be your fear, and He shall be your dread. (Isaiah 8:11-13 NASV)
Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men [such as from today's media], neither be ye afraid of their revilings. (Isaiah 51:7)
...fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. (Matthew 10:28)
Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil [a false accuser] shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. (Revelation 2:10)

The apostles were admonished to beware of men and their governments; however, they were not to be fearful of them:

Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; therefore be shrewd as serpents, and innocent as doves. But beware of men; for they will deliver you up to the courts, and scourge you in their synagogues; and you shall even be brought before governors and kings for My sake, as a testimony to them and to the Gentiles. But when they deliver you up, do not become anxious.... (Matthew 10:16-19 NASV)

King Solomon provided a similar admonition:

If the ruler's temper rises against you, do not abandon your position, because composure allays great offenses. (Ecclesiastes 10:4 NASV)

Refusing to fear anyone or anything other than Yahweh is a demonstration of faith, and it is our faith that overcomes the world - 1 John 5:4. Moreover, the Apostle Paul described the absence of fear as a "sign of destruction" to our enemies - Philippians 1:28.
The fear of Yahweh is also one of the Biblical prerequisites for both religious and civil leadership - Exodus 18:21, Deuteronomy 17:19, 2 Samuel 23:3 and 2 Chronicles 19:6-7. We are, thus, commanded to fear leaders who fear Yahweh:

My son, fear thou YHWH and the king [or the ruler who fears Yahweh].... (Proverbs 24:21)

The fear of God-fearing leaders, rather than being contrary to the previous passages, is essentially an expansion of fearing Yahweh Himself.

Love

...Israel, what doth YHWH thy God require of thee, but to fear YHWH thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve YHWH thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul. (Deuteronomy 10:12)
...thou shalt love YHWH thy God, and keep his charge, and his statutes, and his judgments, and his commandments, always. (Deuteronomy 11:1)
If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams ... saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for YHWH your God proveth you, to know whether ye love YHWH your God with all your heart and with all your soul. Ye shall walk after YHWH your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. (Deuteronomy 13:1-4)
For this is the love [for] God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. (1 John 5:3)

The fear of Yahweh is where First Commandment observance begins; nevertheless, under the New Covenant love for Yahweh should be our primary incentive for keeping not only the First Commandment but all of the other commandments as well.

Worship

For thou shalt worship no other god: for YHWH, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. (Exodus 34:14)
Take heed ... that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and ... worship them [other gods]; and then YHWH's wrath be kindled against you.... (Deuteronomy 11:16-17)
Give unto YHWH the glory due unto his name; worship YHWH in the beauty of holiness. (Psalm 29:2)
Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. (Matthew 15:7-9)
Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.... For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. (Romans 1:22-25 NASV)
...we are the true circumcision, who worship in the Spirit of God and glory in [the] Christ Yeshua and put no confidence in the flesh. (Philippians 3:3 NASV)

Love for Yahweh generates worship. Thus, those who hate Yahweh worship other gods. Astrologers, evolutionists, humanists and Jews are some of the people who transgress this First Commandment statute by replacing worship of the Creator with worship of His creation. It is obvious how astrologers, evolutionists and humanists transgress this statute, but it may not be so obvious how today's Jews are guilty of this same transgression. The Jews adhere to the Talmud (which perverts the laws of Yahweh) rather than the Torah; therefore most Jews do not worship Yahweh as their God. Furthermore, many Jews look to themselves as their own god. Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal expounded upon the way in which his fellow Jews have replaced the worship of Yahweh with the worship of themselves:

"In contemporary Judaism the worship of the state of Israel and its symbols has been gradually and unfortunately crowding out the worship of the One God [Yahweh]."17
"...the Jews ... became abject idolaters of the new polytheism - nationalism. Their relationship to God was subordinated to their relationship toward one another."18

In an address delivered in 1910 before the New York Free Synagogue, Jacob H. Schiff was more pointed:

"'Hear, Oh Israel, the Lord our God is the only God' has a living meaning ... the day will come ... when the Unity of God and the brotherhood of man will be universally recognized, is a Jew."19

It was probably in the Jewish Cabala that the blasphemous idea of Jewish divinity first originated:

"The Jew is the living God, God incarnate: he is the heavenly man. The other men [non-Jews] are earthly, of inferior race. They exist only to serve the Jew. They are the cattle seed."20

In his book The Messianic Idea of Israel, Joseph Klausner provided the Jewish concept of the Redeemer:

"...the whole people Israel [the Jews misnamed] ... gradually became the Messiah of the world, the redeemer of mankind."21

True Christianity recognizes that the Messiah is God, or that a part of God resides in the Messiah. Consequently, any person or group claiming to be the Messiah is also claiming to be God and is essentially worshiping the creature rather than the Creator.

Serve and Obey

Thou shalt make no covenant with them [the heathen non-Israelites - verses 23-28], nor with their gods. They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee. (Exodus 23:32-33)
Thou shalt fear YHWH thy God, and serve him, and shalt swear by his name. Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the people which are round about you.... (Deuteronomy 6:13-15)
...Israel, what doth YHWH thy God require of thee, but to fear YHWH thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve YHWH thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul, to keep the commandments of YHWH, and his statutes, which I command thee this day for thy good? (Deuteronomy 10:12-13)
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon [anything that replaces Yahweh]. (Matthew 6:24)

Anyone refusing to serve Yahweh and keep His commandments does not love Yahweh:

If ye love me, keep my commandments. (John 14:15)
For this is the love [for] God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. (1 John 5:3)


No Other Names

...in all things that I have said unto you be circumspect: and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it [them] be heard out of thy mouth. (Exodus 23:13)

In other words, the names of other gods are not to be a part of our everyday language. They certainly should not be employed so as to put them on equal footing with Yahweh. Ancient Israel often transgressed this statute even to the point of calling Yahweh "Baal":

...it shall be ... saith YHWH, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali. (Hosea 2:16)

The Apostle Peter applied this statute when he made the following proclamation:

Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other [than Yeshua's] name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. (Acts 4:12)


No Covenants With Non-Israelites and/or Non-Christians

Thou [Israel] shalt make no covenant with them [non-Israelites], nor with their gods. (Exodus 23:32)
...ye shall make no league with the [non-Israelite heathen] inhabitants of this land; ye shall throw down their altars.... (Judges 2:2)
Be ye [Christian Israelites] not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people." (2 Corinthians 6:14-16)

This statute applies to treaties, pacts, alliances, coalitions, federations, partnerships, marriages, et al. America, as a nation, has no business making treaties such as GATT and NAFTA with heathen nations, and we, as individuals, have no business entering into partnerships with or marrying non-Christians or non-Israelites.
As for miscegenation, that is, marriage to non-Israelites, Yahweh's law declares that the descendants of such miscegenators were not to be permitted to abide in the same geographical land area as Israel:

A bastard [4464 mamzer (mam-zare'); from an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. born of a (Israelite) father and a heathen mother - Strong's Exhaustive Concordance] shall not enter into the congregation of YHWH [a term in the Bible primarily applied to Israel's geographical land area]; even to his tenth generation [a Hebrew idiom meaning forever] shall he not enter into the congregation of YHWH. (Deuteronomy 23:2)

"Kind after kind" has been Yahweh's law from the beginning - Genesis 1.

No Integration With Non-Israelite Heathen

They [non-Israelite infidels - verses 23-28] shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me [Yahweh]: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee. (Exodus 23:33)
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith YHWH, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith YHWH Almighty. (2 Corinthians 6:17-18)

Christian Israel cannot allow foreigners serving spurious gods to abide in her midst without suffering horrific consequences. The following principle applies as much to nations as it does to individuals:

Do not be deceived: "Bad company corrupts good morals." (1 Corinthians 15:33 NASV)

In 1776 there were approximately 2.5 million people in America. Less than one percent of the population was represented by 20,000 Catholics, 3,000 non-Israelite Jews22, and a few Deists; more than ninety-nine percent were white Christian Israelite23 Protestants. In light of these demographics, it is an illuminating fact that the more non-Israelite heathen immigrants allowed to remain in this country, the less Christian this nation becomes. Our tolerance for other religions is destroying America. It is undeniable that the more multicultural America has become, the more religiously pluralistic she has become, and the more pluralistic America has become the more heathen and ungodly she has become as well. In a chapter entitled "Most Americans Claim Religious Affiliation" in her book The Official Guide to the American Marketplace, demographics specialist Cheryl Russell confirmed this paganizing of America:

Immigration will slowly change the nation's [America's predominately Christian] religious affiliation.... Because most of the nation's immigrants are from Mexico ... the Roman Catholic church is likely to gain adherents. The influx of Asian immigrants should boost the share of Americans who are Buddhist or Hindu.24

Martin E. Marty, a nationally acclaimed demographics expert and director of the Public Religion Project has also confirmed this demographic reality:

"No one noticed it at the time, but the biggest event affecting [non-Christian polytheistic] pluralism was in 1965, when immigration quotas that favored Europeans were altered."25

Yahweh warned Israel that foreigners allowed to settle in her land would become snares and thorns:

...YHWH spake unto Moses ... saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them ... drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places: And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land.... But if ye will not drive out the [non-Israelite] inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell. Moreover it shall come to pass, that I shall do unto you, as I thought to do unto them. (Numbers 33:50-56)
Take good heed therefore unto yourselves, that ye love YHWH your God. Else if ye do in any wise go back, and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriages with them, and go in unto them, and they to you: Know for a certainty that YHWH your God will no more drive out any of these nations from before you; but they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which YHWH your God hath given you. (Joshua 23:11-13)

Certain non-Israelite Jewish26 authors have been honest enough to admit that they (among others peoples) are a modern fulfillment of these two passages:

The Christian nations, you believe, would have perhaps less objection against the restoration of the Jewish State, since they would hope through this to be rid of an alien population which was always a thorn in their side.27
Every synagogue we Jews build in Christian countries is a finger of scorn we point at our hosts, a sore finger we stick into their eyes, like the leering of a senile old woman who does all sorts of foul mischief before you, and feels safe in the knowledge that you will not lay hands on her to remove her, for fear of contamination.28

The Israelites who returned with Ezra and Nehemiah to rebuild Jerusalem understood that this First Commandment statute must be implemented if the Kingdom of God was to be restored:

Now it came to pass, when they [the Israelites] had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.... Thus [were they] cleansed ... from all strangers.... (Nehemiah 13:3-30)


First Commandment Judgment

If there arise among you a prophet [or your brother, son, daughter, wife, friend or neighbor, verses 16-18] ... saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them ... that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from YHWH your God ... to thrust thee out of the way which YHWH thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from the midst of thee. (Deuteronomy 13:1-5)
If there be found among you ... man or woman, that hath ... gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven ... and it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and inquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel: Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die. At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death. The hands of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterward the hands of all the people. So thou shalt put the evil away from among you. (Deuteronomy 17:2-7)

First Commandment trangression requires the death penalty. For the remnant of Christian Israel who love their God, it takes little more than a suggestion from Yahweh to get them to do what He desires. However, for the vast majority of people living in America today, those described by Yeshua as walking in the broad way, commandments enforced by their respective judgments are mandatory to secure a more comprehensive adherence to Yahweh's laws and to ensure a functioning Christian society. This idea is conveyed by the Apostle Paul in the thirteenth chapter of his epistle to the Roman Christians:

For [Christian] rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: for he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath [the judgments of God] upon him that doeth evi [who breaks one or more of the commandments of Yahweh]. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. (Romans 13:3-5)

A person is provided three options under this form of government:


  • obedience to the laws of Yahweh as an outcome of a good conscience,
  • obedience to the laws of Yahweh as a result of fear of the sword, i.e., the judgments of Yahweh, or
  • the judgments of Yahweh as the consequence of disobedience to Yahweh's laws.

Paul elaborated upon the latter two options in his first epistle to Timothy:

...the law [specifically the judgments] is ... made for ... the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind [homosexuals], for menstealers [kidnappers], for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine. (1 Timothy 1:8-10)

The commandments and statutes alone have proved futile for the type of person described in this passage. Consequently, Paul was referring to the judgments of Yahweh. Such criminally-minded people will either keep the commandments and statutes out of fear of "the sword," or they should be put under "the sword" for their disobedience, and thus wickedness would be purged from among us. Under a government that administers the judgments of Yahweh, such wickedness would be the exception rather than the rule.
Our quest toward restoring Yahweh's laws begins with the First Commandment. Let us return to Yahweh as our God and King and love and serve only Him.
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (129)  
Tagged with: Religion, truth, God, USA, Commandments

You Might be a Christain if...

Posted on Feb 19th, 2009 by Faith : Wild Child Faith
Web Link: http://www.missiontoisrael.org/constitutionalist.php

I recently received an email from Chuck Baldwin1 entitled "You Might be a Constitutionalist if...." I took his thirty-question test contained therein and failed miserably. I am definitely not a Constitutionalist, and I hope you're not either!

Please consider the following response to Mr. Baldwin's comments and questionnaire. In no fashion is this meant to insult or demean him; I appreciate many of his common-sense commentaries. However, when it comes to this issue, I believe he is in error and is even subtly contributing to America's problems.

Most of Baldwin's readers would agree that a return to the constitutional form of government that some of our founding fathers had in mind would be an undeniable improvement upon what it has evolved into today. But therein is the problem, not the solution. The Constitution was a Pandora's Box that opened the door to the plight in which modern-day America finds herself. Even with the Constitution being what many people consider man's best attempt at government, it was inevitable for it to devolve into what it has become today. Therefore a return to a constitutional form of government would only begin the process all over again, and we would be simply passing our or similar problems on to another generation of Americans.

Pandora's box was opened when the framers of the United States Constitution chose man's best rather than Yahweh's2 best. Rather than just giving Him lip service, it is time for Christians3 to begin living as if they truly believed that Yahweh's kingdom and His laws are perfect:

The law of YHWH4 is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of YHWH is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of YHWH are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of YHWH is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of YHWH is clean, enduring forever: the judgments of YHWH are true and righteous altogether. Psalm 19:7-9

Many churches contribute to the problem by teaching that Yahweh's laws under the New Covenant have been abolished. However, the author of Hebrews, quoting the prophet Jeremiah, described the New Covenant as Yahweh's laws written on the hearts and minds of today's Christian Israelites5:

For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith YHWH, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith YHWH. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith YHWH; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people. Hebrews 8:8-106

The Apostle Paul asked and answered the following rhetorical question:

Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. Romans 3:31

Because Yahweh's laws are perfect, they cannot be improved upon by adulterating them with man's constitutions or other amendments, no matter how good they may at first appear. It ultimately comes down to a choice between the document that begins "We the people...." and the one that begins "In the beginning God...." Regrettably, the framers of the Constitution and well-meaning people today, such as Baldwin, appeal to the former inferior option, which, at the best, can only put a band-aide on the problems we face today. Christians must appeal to the Word of God and particularly the perfect laws of Yahweh.

With this premise in mind, let us proceed to Baldwin's opening remarks. He began by pointing out that for "more than thirty years" he has been "a student of American history, constitutional government, and the Holy Bible." There is certainly nothing wrong with studying any or all of these areas. However, I find the order in which they were listed interesting in that he placed American history and constitutional government before the Bible. Perhaps this order is only indicative of Baldwin's personal progression in study. However, for far too many Christian patriots, this is the order and priority in which they study; and consequently they are more fluent in American history and the U.S. Constitution than they are in the Bible.

Baldwin went on to write that those three areas of study led him to "the conviction that the two major political parties in this country are equally culpable in stripping America of its founding principles." A person does not need to be a student of the Constitution to discern this erosion of early America's guiding principles - a study of the Bible and American history alone will lead a person to the same conclusion. Furthermore, what Baldwin and many other Constitutionalists fail to understand is that America's founding principles came from the 1600s, not the 1700s. And those principles were biblical, not constitutional. Better stated, America's original constitution was the Bible alone. At that time, there was minimal interference from King George across the Atlantic Ocean. But thanks to the Constitution, we now have "King" George in our back pocket, further stripping away our freedoms.

Baldwin went on to write that "In my opinion, both the Democrat and Republican parties ... have zero fidelity to the U.S. Constitution and zero respect for America's founding precepts." Much more consequential is their ignorance and lack of fidelity to the Bible and the laws of Yahweh.

Later Baldwin declared that "both major parties have become impotent and irrelevant when it comes to representing constitutional principles...." I wholeheartedly agree that both the Democrats and the Republicans have become impotent and irrelevant, but the reason for their impotence and irrelevance is because they do not represent Yahweh's perfect laws.

Following is Baldwin's test to determine whether the reader is a Constitutionalist. My comments are inserted between each question.

  1. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that elected leaders should really obey the U.S. Constitution.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that biblically qualified leaders should be appointed, not elected.7 Constitutionalists desire elected officials who will faithfully obey the U.S. Constitution, whereas Bible believing Christians desire the day when biblically qualified Christian men will truly obey and enforce the laws of Yahweh.


  2. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that before the United States invades and occupies another country, Congress must first declare war.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that we should not invade and occupy another country unless mandated or authorized by Yahweh, nor should we go to war with another nation unless it invades us or otherwise endangers our national sovereignty.8


  3. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe the federal government should live within its means, like everyone else is forced to do.

    What "means" is Baldwin referring to - those collected from income, property and other non-biblical confiscatory taxes? You might be a Christian if you believe the only biblical tax is the tithe on one's increase.9


  4. You might be a Constitutionalist if you think that taking away people's liberties in the name of security is neither patriotic nor does it make the country more secure.

    You might be a Christian if you think that taking away people's liberties in the name of security is neither biblical nor does it make the country more secure. Freedom is a biblical not a constitutional or patriotic issue. Only Yahweh can provide genuine freedom in both spirit and person (John 8:36, 1 Corinthians 7:21-23).


  5. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to see politicians be forced to abide by the same laws they make everyone else submit to.

    You might be a Christian if you want to see all politicians replaced by biblically appointed leaders who must write out their own copy of Yahweh's laws, read them daily, abide by them, and then see that they are enforced.10


  6. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that we have three coequal branches of government that are supposed to hold each other in check and balance.

    You might be a Christian if you understand that all three branches of government reside in Yahweh as described in Isaiah 33:22 - "For Yahweh is our judge [judicial], Yahweh is our lawgiver [legislative], Yahweh is our king [executive]...." All power and authority reside in Yahweh, He is His own check and balance, and He does not answer to anyone. Furthermore, only biblically qualified appointed men have authority to represent Yahweh and His kingdom in these three areas.


  7. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe the federal government has no authority to be involved in education or law enforcement.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that according to Deuteronomy 6:6-7 and Ephesians 6:4 that government has no authority to be involved in education.

    Furthermore, you might be a Christian if you believe according to Romans 13:3-411 and 1 Timothy 1:8-11 that government, composed of biblically qualified appointed men, do have authority to be involved in law enforcement, i.e., the expeditious punishment of criminals (Ecclesiastes 8:11), who are found guilty by biblical judicial protocol.12


  8. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that gun-control laws do nothing but aid and abet criminals while trampling the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens.

    You might be a Christian if you believe the right and responsibility to bear arms comes from Yahweh, not the U.S. Constitution.13


  9. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the income tax is both unconstitutional and immoral and, along with the I.R.S., should be abolished.

    You might be a Christian if you believe income, property and other confiscatory taxes are both unbiblical and immoral and, along with the I.R.S., should be abolished.14


  10. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe the federal government had no authority to tell Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore that he could not display a monument containing the Ten Commandments in the Alabama Judicial Building in Montgomery.

    You might be a Christian if you if you believe that all American justices should be enforcing the Ten Commandments and their respective statutes and judgments, and that any judge who refuses to do so should be immediately removed from his bench.


  11. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that neither Congress nor the White House nor any sovereign state is required to submit to unconstitutional Supreme Court rulings such as the Roe v Wade decision.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that no one is required to submit to any unbiblical court decision, such as Roe v Wade,15 and that any judge who makes such a ruling should be immediately removed from his bench.


  12. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that freedom has nothing to do with illegal immigration.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that Christian nations should be segregated. The more integrated America has become, the more multicultural she has become, and the more multicultural she has become, the more non-Christian she has become.16


  13. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that outsourcing American jobs overseas is not good for America.

    You might be a Christian if you understand that business partnerships with non-Christians and non-Israelites are violations of the Word of God and are transgressions of the First Commandment.17


  14. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the United States should get out of the United Nations and get the United Nations out of the United States.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that the United States has no business making treaties with any non-Christian or non-Israelite nations including those participating in the United Nations.18


  15. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that it is not unconstitutional for children in public schools to pray or read the Bible.

    You might be a Christian if you believe Yahweh intends parents to teach their own children. Government schools are not biblical, and no one should be taxed to pay for the education of someone else's children. Public school prayer and Bible reading is not the issue.


  16. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the Boy Scouts are not a threat to America.

    You might be a Christian if you believe according to Leviticus 20:13 that sodomy is a capital crime and that all biblically convicted practicing homosexuals should be publicly executed. The Boy Scouts' policies regarding homosexuals is not the issue.19


  17. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government should honor its commitments to America's veterans.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that every able-bodied man, twenty years and older, is automatically enlisted in America's militia and is expected at any given time to defend himself, his family and his nation.20

    You might furthermore be a Christian if you do not buy into the idea that even if we do not support the President in his cause that we must support our troops in an ungodly war. Christians should pray that Yahweh will allow our troops to return home as soon as possible, and that He will not judge them and America too harshly for this unjustified war of aggression.


  18. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that U.S. troops should never serve under foreign commanders or wear the uniform or insignia of the United Nations.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that the United States has no business making treaties with any non-Christian or non-Israelite nation and that according to Deuteronomy 17:15, non-Israelites should never be appointed to rule over Israelites in any capacity.21


  19. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government has no business bribing churches and faith-based organizations with federal tax dollars.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that the government has no business licensing churches or ministries in the first place. Furthermore, you might be a Christian if you believe that churches have no business entering into a symbiotic relationship with government via the 501(c)(3) tax exempt status provided by government.22


  20. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that federal agents who murder American citizens should be held to the same laws and punishments that any other citizen would be held to.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that there should be no federal agents in America, and that all people should be judged equally under the laws of Yahweh.


  21. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, and FTAA are disastrous compromises of America's national sovereignty and independence.

    You might be a Christian if you understand that the United States has no business making treaties with any non-Christian or non-Israelite nation.23


  22. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to see Congressmen and Senators be required to actually read a bill before passing it into law.

    You might be a Christian if you would like to see all politicians replaced by biblically appointed leaders who must write out their own copy of Yahweh's laws, read them daily, abide by them, and then see that they are enforced.24


  23. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that it is the job of government to protect and secure God-given rights not use its power to take those rights away.

    You might be a Christian if you understand that punishing all criminals convicted of transgressing Yahweh's laws secures and protects our God-given rights.


  24. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that there is nothing unconstitutional with the public acknowledgement of God and our Christian heritage.

    You might be a Christian if you understand that public acknowledgement of God and our Christian heritage is a duty and it makes it no difference to you whether the Constitution sanctions it or not.


  25. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that in the beginning God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that sodomy is an abomination and a capital crime against Yahweh and society.


  26. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that airport screeners have no business touching women's breasts and confiscating fingernail clippers.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that all able-bodied Christian men should be armed without government licensing and that had they been, the 9/11 hijackings would have never occurred and women would not be subjected to such humiliation in today's airports.


  27. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that many public schools' "zero-tolerance" policies are just plain stupid.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that America should have no public schools whatsoever. "Zero-tolerance" policies are not the issue.


  28. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that parents have a right to home school their children.

    You might be a Christian if you do not believe in public schools at all and that only parents or someone delegated by a child's father should be teaching his children.


  29. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that government seizure of private property is plain old fashioned thievery.

    You might be a Christian if you believe that government seizure of private property, whether as a consequence of property taxes or any other reason, is plain old-fashioned thievery.25


  30. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to meet one single Congressman or Senator besides Ron Paul who acts as if he or she has ever read the U.S. Constitution.

You might be a Christian if you would like to meet one single Congressman or Senator, including Ron Paul and America's preachers, who act as if he has read the Bible, in particular Yahweh's laws. Any man26 unwilling to read, write, abide by, and enforce Yahweh's laws should be immediately removed from his position of leadership in American government.

Mr. Baldwin concluded his questionnaire by asking, "Well, how did you fare? Are you a Constitutionalist? If you are, why not consider joining the Constitution Party? Check out their website at: http://www.constitutionparty.com/."

If you claim to be a practicing Christian, why not, instead, join the effort to help establish Yahweh's kingdom here on earth as it is in heaven, based solely upon His laws. Although the Constitutionalists fall short of Yahweh's perfect laws in some areas, they do have some things in common with genuine Christianity. But here's the point - Constitutionalists are superfluous if Christians would just begin conducting themselves like Christians.

We do not have to be Constitutionalists or even Christian Constitutionalists to achieve many of things that Mr. Baldwin wants to see accomplished, we simply need to be a Bible-practicing Christians. If Christendom would quit believing the lies that Christians should not be involved in government affairs and that the laws of Yahweh have been abolished, if they would get their heads out of the clouds and begin fulfilling what they pray "...Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven," they would not need the U.S. Constitution to accomplish any of those things. The only constitution that genuine Christians need is the one that opens "In the beginning God...."


E-mail This Article To A Friend

An expanded audio version of this article, entitled "You Might be A Christian If..." is available on CD or cassette tape. It may be purchased or ordered on a listen-and-return basis. Fill out and send in the order form. Or you may request the same by title by emailing here.

END NOTES

1. Chuck Baldwin was presidential candidate Michael Peroutka's running mate on the Constitutional Party ticket for 2004. He may be contacted at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/.

2. "Yahweh" is the personal Hebrew name of the God of the Bible. For a more thorough explanation concerning the use of the sacred names of God, The Third Commandment may be read at www.missiontoisrael.org/3rdcom-pt1.php, or Thou shalt not take the name of Yahweh thy God in vain, by Ted R. Weiland, may ordered as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

3. Not everyone claiming to be a Christian has been properly instructed in the biblical plan of salvation. Therefore, in many instances the designation "Christian" is used in a generic sense only. Mark 16:15-16, Acts 2:36-41, 22:1-16, Romans 6:3-4, Galatians 3:26-27 and 1 Peter 3:21 should be studied in order to understand what is required for salvation in Yeshua the Christ. For more information concerning baptism and its relationship to salvation, Baptism by the Scriptures may be read at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/baptismbythescriptures.php, or it may be ordered as a free tract from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363.

4. Where the Tetragrammaton YHWH - the four Hebrew characters that represent the personal name of God - has been incorrectly rendered the LORD or GOD in Scripture, I have taken the liberty to correct this error by inserting YHWH where appropriate. For a more thorough explanation concerning the use of the sacred names of God, The Third Commandment may be read at www.missiontoisrael.org/3rdcom-pt1.php, or Thou shalt not take the name of Yahweh thy God in vain, by Ted R. Weiland, may ordered as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

5. God's Covenant People: Yesterday, Today and Forever, by Ted R. Weiland, provides a documented dissertation identifying Israel with today's Celtic, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred peoples. The majority of God's Covenant People may be read online at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/gods-covenant-people/tableofcontents.php, or it mat be obtained in its entirety as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363. Suggested donation: hard cover - $23.00, soft cover - $14.00.*

6. For a more thorough explanation concerning Yahweh's laws as they apply to today, Yah's Laws: Are They for Today? and The Perfect Law of Liberty may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/yahs-laws-1.php and http://missiontoisrael.org/law-of-liberty.php. Yah's Laws: Are They for Today? is also available as a free tract from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363.

7. For a more thorough explanation concerning appointment versus election, To Vote or Not to Vote? may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/vote.php.

8. For a more thorough explanation concerning the biblical laws of warfare, The Sixth Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/6thcom.php.

9. For a more thorough explanation concerning biblical taxes, The Second Commandment and The Fourth Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/secondcom.php and http://missiontoisrael.org/4thcom.php, or Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image and Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy may be obtained as books from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation each.*

10. For a list of these and other biblical qualifications for leaders, To Vote or Not to Vote? may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/vote.php.

11. Christian Duty Under Corrupt Government: A Revolutionary Commentary on Romans 13:1-7, by Ted R. Weiland, provides a detailed commentary on Romans 13:1-7. Christian Duty may be obtained from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $7 donation.

12. For a more thorough explanation concerning biblical judicial protocol, Capital Punishment: Deterrent or Catalyst? may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/capital-punishment.php, or it may be obtained as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $2 donation.*

13. For a more thorough explanation concerning the biblical right and responsibility to bear arms, Firearms: Scripturally Defended may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/firearm-right.php.

14. For a more thorough explanation concerning biblical taxes, The Second Commandment and The Fourth Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/secondcom.php and http://missiontoisrael.org/4thcom.php, or Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image and Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy may be obtained as books from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation each.

15. Christian Duty Under Corrupt Government: A Revolutionary Commentary on Romans 13:1-7, by Ted R. Weiland, provides a more thorough explanation concerning the type of governments that Christians are not obligated to submit to. Christian Duty may be obtained from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $7 donation.*

16. For a more thorough explanation concerning segregation, The First Commandment, The Third Commandment and The Seventh Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/first-commandment.php, http://www.missiontoisrael.org/3rdcom-pt1.php and http://missiontoisrael.org/7thcom-pt1.php respectively. Thou shalt have no other gods before me and Thou shalt not take the name of Yahweh thy God in vain may also be obtained as books from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation each.*

17. For a more thorough explanation concerning not covenanting with non-Christians and non-Israelites, The First Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/first-commandment.php, or Thou shalt have no other gods before me may be obtained as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

18. For a more thorough explanation on not making treaties with non-Christian and non-Israelite nations, The First Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/first-commandment.php, or Thou shalt have no other gods before me may be obtained as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

19. For a list of all crimes identified in the Bible as punishable by death, Capital Punishment: Deterrent or Catalyst? may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/capital-punishment.php, or it may be obtained as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $2 donation.*

20. For a more thorough explanation concerning self-defense, Firearms: Scripturally Defended may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/firearm-right.php, and for a more thorough explanation concerning biblical warfare, The Sixth Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/6thcom.php.

21. For a more thorough explanation concerning not making treaties with non-Christians and non-Israelites, The First Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/first-commandment.php, and for the biblical qualifications for leaders, To Vote or Not to Vote may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/vote.php. Thou shalt have no other gods before me may also be obtained as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

22. For a more thorough explanation concerning the 501(c)(3) tax exempt status, The Second Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/secondcom.php, or Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image may be obtained as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

23. For a more thorough explanation concerning not making treaties with non-Christians and non-Israelites, The First Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/first-commandment.php, or Thou shalt have no other gods before me may be obtained as book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

24. For a list of the biblical qualifications for leaders, To Vote or Not to Vote may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/vote.php.

25. For a more thorough explanation concerning property taxes, The Fourth Commandment may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/4thcom.php, or Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy may be obtained as a book from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363 for a suggested $4 donation.*

26. According to the Bible, only biblically qualified men are to be in positions of leadership. For more on Yahweh's patriarchal system, To Vote or Not to Vote may be read at http://missiontoisrael.org/vote.php.

*Although there is a suggested price for our books, we do not sell them. We are admonished in Proverbs 23:23 to "buy truth, and sell it not" and in Matthew 10:8 "freely ye have received, freely give." This ministry is supported by freewill tithes and offerings in keeping with 2 Corinthians 9:7. If you cannot afford the suggested price, simply inform us of your situation and we will be pleased to provide you with whatever you need for whatever you can send.

An expanded audio version of this article, entitled "You Might be A Christian If..." is available on CD or cassette tape. It may be purchased or ordered on a listen-and-return basis. Fill out and send in an order form

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (76)  

Bible Law Vs. The United States Constitution Chapter 3

Posted on Feb 13th, 2009 by Faith : Wild Child Faith
 Website of this article: http://www.missiontoisrael.org/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt3.php

Chapter 3
The Preamble: WE THE PEOPLE vs. Yahweh
The Preamble
WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
A New God

Constitutionalists often claim the United States Constitution was divinely inspired. It was inspired, not by Yahweh,1 but by the new god known as WE THE PEOPLE.

WE THE PEOPLE became the replacement god for Yahweh, who was formally abandoned the moment the Constitutional framers penned the first three words of the Preamble and put their signatures to the social compact of the U.S. Constitution. The fact that they penned those words at all demonstrates they had already rejected Yahweh as their personal God - although some framers claimed otherwise.

The idea that WE THE PEOPLE represents a new god will initially prove difficult for many readers. Therefore, let me defer to the inescapable truths of government and religion, as presented by R.J. Rushdoony in his book The Institutes of Biblical Law. Note particularly Point #2:

  1. Law is in every culture religious in origin.
  2. The source of law is the god of that society.
  3. In any society, any change of law is an explicit or implicit change of religion.
  4. No disestablishment of religion as such is possible in any society.
  5. There can be no tolerance in a law-system for another religion.2

Let me elaborate upon these points one at a time.

Point #1: "Law is in every culture religious in origin." All law reflects a society's morality (or, in most instances, legalized immorality3) and is, therefore, religious in both origin and nature.

Point #2: "The source of law is the god of that society." Consider the following definitions of "theocracy":

Government of a state by the immediate direction of God.4

1. a form of government in which God or a deity is recognized as the supreme ruler.... 3. a commonwealth or state under such a form of government....5

Not all theocracies are Christian. There are Jewish theocracies, Hindu theocracies, Islamic theocracies, and Buddhist theocracies, each with their own godhead. In fact, there is no such thing as a non-theocratic government. All governments are theocracies, based upon the laws of either Yahweh or a replacement god.

In 1 Corinthians 8:4, the Apostle Paul informs us that "...there is none other God but one."6 Therefore, there can be only one true theocracy. All other governments represent humanism, in any of its limitless forms. The United States Constitutional Republic is just one of many in which the people have replaced Yahweh as the god of their society. It is what might be dubbed a human theocracy. Each and every government's laws reflect either Yahweh or man. Antinomians should take serious pause at the implications of these inescapable conclusions.

Not only are all governments theocracies, but as such they are theocentric - that is, god-centered. So it is with a government of, by, and for Yahweh; and so it is with a government of, by, and for the people. Herein we find the battle so often described in the Bible: the war between Yahweh's will and man's will:

It is better to trust in YHWH7 than to put confidence in man. It is better to trust in YHWH than to put confidence in princes. (Psalm 118:8-9)

As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of YHWH, we will not hearken unto thee. But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth.... (Jeremiah 44:16-17)

The first three words of the Preamble are nothing more than an American expression of this same eternal conflict.

In an interview on Bill Moyers Journal, 2008 Republican presidential candidate, and one of today's greatest defenders of the U.S. Constitution, Ron Paul declared, "The idea of a theocracy very much annoys me."8 But, the fact is, a theocracy does not annoy Paul at all - at least not the theocracy of WE THE PEOPLE. He, like most Americans, is only offended by Yahweh's theocracy.

Point #3: "In any society, any change of law is an explicit or implicit change of religion." This means that with any change of law, an explicit or implicit change of gods occurs as well. More on this later.

Point #4: "No disestablishment of religion as such is possible in any society." Every society's government is religious in nature because all law is religious in origin and reflects the god of that government. There is no escaping this reality.

Point #5: "There can be no tolerance in a law-system for another religion." This is the same as saying that one law system can have no tolerance for any laws inconsonant with their own laws. Rushdoony commented, "Every law-system must maintain its existence by hostility to every other law-system and to alien religious foundations or else it commits suicide."9 This was as much as stated in the following Supreme Court cases, which are so-often peddled by Constitutionalists:

All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
-Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 164, 176 (1803)

An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no right; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
-Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425, 442 (1886)

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.
-Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491 (1966)

A Change of Religion

Based on the idea that all law is religious in nature, Rushdoony declared that any change of law is an explicit or implicit change of religion and, therefore, a change of gods. How does this reflect upon the U.S. Constitution?

History demonstrates that during the 17th and early 18th centuries Yahweh's laws governed much of America. Volumes of documents testify that early Americans formed Christian governments designed around Yahweh's laws10:

The Portsmouth, Rhode Island Compact, 1638
We whose names are underwritten do hereby solemnly in the presence of Jehovah incorporate ourselves into a Bodie Politick and as He shall help, will submit our persons, lives and estates unto our Lord Jesus Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, and to all those perfect and most absolute laws of His given in His Holy Word of truth, to be guided and judged thereby.

Fundamental Agreement of the Colony of New Haven, Connecticut, 1639
Agreement; We all agree that the scriptures hold forth a perfect rule for the direction and government of all men in duties which they are to perform to God and to man, as well in families and commonwealth as in matters of the church; so likewise in all public officers which concern civil order, as choice of magistrates and officers, making and repealing laws, dividing allotments of inheritance, and all things of like nature, we will, all of us, be ordered by the rules which the scripture holds forth; and we agree that such persons may be entrusted with such matters of government as are described in Exodus 18:21 and Deuteronomy 1:13 with Deuteronomy 17:15 and 1 Corinthians 6:1,6 & 7....

Almost as impressive as New Haven's agreement are the testimonies to this and other similar documents:

John Clark Ridpath, History of the United States, 1874
In June of 1639 the leading men of New Haven held a convention in a barn, and formally adopted the Bible as the constitution of the State. Everything was strictly conformed to the religious standard. The government was called the House of Wisdom.... None but church members were admitted to the rights of citizenship.11

Note, an American Constitution existed almost 140 years prior to the United States Constitution.

Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1835
They exercised the rights of sovereignty; they named their magistrates, concluded peace or declared war, made police regulations, and enacted laws as if their allegiance was due only to God. Nothing can be more curious and, at the same time more instructive, than the legislation of that period; it is there that the solution of the great social problem which the United States now present to the world is to be found.

Amongst these documents we shall notice, as especially characteristic, the code of laws promulgated by the little State of Connecticut in 1650. The legislators of Connecticut begin with the penal laws, and ... they borrow their provisions from the text of Holy Writ. "Whosoever shall worship any other God than the Lord," says the preamble of the Code, "shall surely be put to death." This is followed by ten or twelve enactments of the same kind, copied verbatim from the books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy. Blasphemy, sorcery, adultery, and rape were punished with death....12

In Proverbs 14:34, Solomon declared that "righteousness exalteth a nation." Righteousness is only found in Yahweh's perfect laws (Psalm 19:7-9). As attested by French statesman Alexis de Tocqueville, America was once an exalted nation, to which other nations looked as an example. Since 1787, when America, as a nation, stopped following Yahweh's laws and began following the laws of WE THE PEOPLE, our legislation has ceased providing instruction to others. Instead, the rest of the world now holds America in disdain.

McGuffey's Eclectic Reader, Nineteenth-century America's most popular school book, also testified to America's early theocratic form of government:

McGuffey's Sixth Eclectic Reader, 1879
Their form of government was as strictly theocratical insomuch that it would be difficult to say where there was any civil authority among them distinct from ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Whenever a few of them settled a town, they immediately gathered themselves into a church; and their elders were magistrates, and their code of laws was the Pentateuch.... God was their King; and they regarded him as truly and literally so....13

Considerable differences existed between the Christendom of the 1600s and early 1700s and the Christianity of the late 1700s, as attested by Daniel J. Boorstin in his book The Americans: The Colonial Experience:

Compared with Americans of the 18th or the 19th century, the Puritans surely were theology-minded.... Yet what really distinguished them in their day was that they were less interested in theology itself, than in the application of theology to everyday life, and especially to society. From the 17th-century point of view their interest in theology was practical. They were less concerned with perfecting their formulation of the Truth than with making their society in America embody the Truth they already knew. Puritan New England was a noble experiment in applied theology. ...for testing a theology, for seeing whether Zion [the Kingdom of God] could be rebuilt if men abandoned the false foundations of the centuries since Jesus - for this New England offered a rare opportunity.14

Why not in one unspoiled corner of the world declare a truce on doubts, on theological bickering? Here at last men could devote their full energy to applying Christianity - to building Zion. 15

The history of the New England pulpit is thus an unbroken chronicle of the attempt of leaders in the New World to bring their community steadily closer to the Christian model. The New England meeting-house ... was primarily a place of instruction. Here the community learned its duties ... so they could better build their Zion in the wilderness, a City upon a Hill to which other men might in their turn look for instruction.... In New England the ministers were, in their own words, "opening" the texts of the Bible by which they had to live and build their society. The sermons were thoroughly theological and yet thoroughly practical ... for converting saints and building Zion.16

The Ten Commandments were, of course, in the foreground of their thinking, but the Bible as a whole was the law of their life. For answers to their problems they drew as readily on Exodus, Kings, or Romans, as on the less narrative portions of the Bible.17

The Puritans of Massachusetts Bay said that they started from "the lawes of God" rather than the laws of Englishmen.18

The most dramatic and most obvious [changes in Puritan laws from the laws of England] were in the list of capital crimes. To those crimes punishable by death under the laws of England, the colonists by 1648 had added a number of others, including idolatry (violations of the First Commandment), blasphemy, man-stealing (from Exod. 21.16), adultery with a married woman, perjury with intent to secure the death of another, the cursing of a parent by a child over 16 years of age (Exod. 21.17), the offense of being a "rebellious son" (Deut. 21.20.21).... These were clear cases where the laws of Scripture were allowed to override the laws of England.19

Eighteenth-century Christianity, on the other hand, was depicted quite differently:

...[by] the mid-18th century ... Puritanism was all but dead.20

This means that government based upon the laws of Yahweh was also dead.

The Church of England [Anglicanism], instead of being only one among numerous religious sects, in Virginia was a catholic [universal] church.... Theirs was not a violent passion inspiring men to rebuild Zion ... but a quietly pervasive sentiment which suffused the institutions of the colony with a mild aura of divine sanction.... The responsibilities of governing New England also dulled the edge of dogma so that by the late 17th century they had begun those prudent compromises which would produce 18th-century Congregationalism and 19th-century Unitarianism. Anglicanism in Virginia, for similar reasons, was destined to be even more practical and compromising than it had been in England.21

It is hard to name a leader of the Revolution, including such men as George Washington, James Madison, Edmund Pendleton, and Patrick Henry, who were not securely within the fold of the [Anglican] Church.22

In other words, the framers of the United States Constitution, although mostly churchgoers, were not the same cut of churchmen as those of the 17th century. The churches of the 18th century and the 17th century were radically different. The former were interested in building the Kingdom of God based upon the perfect laws of Yahweh. The latter were not and this certainly contributed to the complete lack of quotations from, or even references to, the laws of Yahweh in the Constitution. (The four volumes of notes from the Constitutional Convention and the Federalist Papers are also conspicuously lacking in Bible references.)

That C. Gregg Singer understood the striking theological differences between the worldviews of the Puritans and Constitutional framers is clearly detailed in his book A Theological Interpretation of American History:

It may very well be said that the first product of the Puritan theology was a Puritan philosophy of government.... The idea that the state was beyond the reach of the claims of the Bible was ... abhorrent to the Puritan.... In the Scriptures they found the origin, the form, the functions and the power of the state and human government. This resort to the Scriptures as the exclusive norm for human political organization and activity clearly differentiated them from both the Roman Catholics and that rising group of secularist writers [particularly in the 1700s] who were finding the origin of the state and the source of its powers in a vaguely defined source known as the social compact or contract. In the Puritan view of life man could no more create the government under which he would live and endow it with its just powers than he could effect his own salvation.23

Basic in Puritan political thought is the doctrine of divine sovereignty. It was the sovereign God who created the state and to it its powers and functions. The earthly magistrate held his position and exercised his power by a divine decree. He was a minister of God under common grace for the execution of the laws of God among the people at large, for the maintenance of law and order, and for so ruling the state.... In Puritan political theory the magistrate derived his powers from God and not from the people....24

The whole conception of government that would later be proclaimed by John Locke and others, which placed the sovereignty in the hands of the people and which found the origin of government in a human compact was utterly unknown to the Puritans. They did not believe in a government by the people....25

[The Puritans sensed] that in the democratic philosophy, with its emphasis upon the sovereignty of the people, lay a fundamental contradiction to the biblical doctrine of the sovereignty of God. They clearly perceived that democracy was the fruit of humanism and not the Reformation concept.26

...it is not too much to say that the separation from England [in the 1700s] could not have taken place unless there had first been a revolt against the Puritan world and life view in the colonies. Richard Mosier correctly stated the case in his The American Temper when he wrote that the struggle against the absolutism of the King of England had its corollary in the struggle against the sovereignty of the Puritan God: "the ‘Revolutionary' could no more admit a sovereign God than he could a sovereign king."27 Thus, Deism provided the motivation for not only the American Revolution, but also for the rise of Democracy in America (as distinct from that type of ... government which had characterized the Puritan movement in the seventeenth century).28

The sovereignty of God was replaced by that of the people and the decrees of God ... were replaced by a nebulous, unhistorical and humanistic concept known as the social contract. The ruler was no longer responsible to God for his administration of government, but responsible to the people. The law he enforced was no longer the revealed will of God for men, but the announced will of the majority which was now sovereign.29

Mosier has well observed that this revolutionary age demanded that both the absolute God and the absolute king must "henceforth rule by the consent of the governed. The God of Puritanism, stripped of His antique powers, had no recourse but to enter as a weakened prince into the temple of the individualism and there to seek refuge."30 This sovereignty which he once claimed, and was accorded by the Puritans, was now claimed by man himself. This was the philosophical and theological outlook of many of the leaders of the Revolution. ...theirs was a secular political philosophy and ... its roots are to be found in the Enlightenment in general, and in Deism in particular. Most of the Revolutionary leaders desired to retain the Christian ethic, but to separate it from the biblical revelation and to find a new basis for it in natural law.31

Put simply: the "world" created by the original Christian American forefathers was turned upside down in the late 1700s.

Constitution vs. Constitution

The Constitutional form of government established in the late 1700s was not practiced in the 1600s or early 1700s. A change of law and government occurred in the late 1700s, supplanting what had been the law and government. From that moment on, the nation that had been predominately Christian became progressively secular and predominantly humanistic.

The change of law and government in the late 1700s also brought about a change of religion, and because the former law and government represented Yahweh, both He and His laws were necessarily discarded for the new god and its laws.

This is difficult to accept, especially because we have repeatedly been told the Constitutional framers were such godly men. Today's Christian32 Constitutionalists are always quick to share the framers' Christian-sounding quotations. But such statements, by themselves, mean nothing. Two-hundred years from now, Christian historians will likely be using Christian-sounding statements from Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barrack Obama to buttress declarations that these men were also great Christians.

In order to conclude that the Constitutional framers were Christians, today's Christian Constitutionalists have severed the framers' words from their actions. This is similar to Christian Republicans who have ignored Bush's conspicuous record and separated his Christian remarks from his actions.33 Christians of every persuasion are notorious for blinding themselves to the facts in order to claim that their political leader is a Christian.

Christian declarations alone mean nothing. A person's Christianity can only be determined by comparing his actions with the Word of God:

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? And in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity (anomian - lawlessness). (Matthew 7:21-23)

This is a perfect description of the Constitutional framers. Although many of them privately and publicly claimed to be Christians, they openly practiced anomianism.

The U.S. Constitution was inspired, not by Yahweh, but by a small group of men claiming to represent their new god - WE THE PEOPLE. Patrick Henry (who refused to be one of Virginia's delegates to the Constitutional Convention, claiming he smelled a rat) later declared the conventioneers had no right to make such a claim. Nevertheless, by their silence, the people gave their assent, as did those in 2 Samuel 24 when King David pursued an unlawful census.

Do not forget that it was not David who took the brunt of Yahweh's wrath, but rather the people who let David get away with the census. Judgment of the people for their rulers' transgressions is found time and again in the Bible (2 Kings 24:1-4, 2 Chronicles 28:19, etc.). The people are ultimately responsible. They were responsible when the Constitutional conventioneers chose a new god, and we will continue to be responsible until we rise up, repent of our forefathers' sins, overthrow the Constitution of WE THE PEOPLE, and return to Yahweh and His Constitution.

Internal Evidence

The real evidence that WE THE PEOPLE represents a new national god is found throughout the United States Constitution, particularly in the Preamble. The Preamble is arguably the most audacious claim to sovereignty ever written. If you stop and think about its presumptuous claims, you will see that this new constitution is humanism of the rankest sort. It is the same sin described by the Prophet Habakkuk:

...[Yahweh's] law is slacked [ignored, NASB], and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth. (Habakkuk 1:4)

The Prophet Malachi put it similarly:

Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law. (Malachi 2:9)

What a perfect description of what occurred at the Constitutional Convention in the late 1700s. The framers were unquestionably slack with Yahweh's laws. They not only compromised Yahweh's laws, they completely ignored them.

With such a significant Christian beginning in the early 1600s, how can we have strayed so far from our Christian roots? The answer is simple: Yahweh's law was slacked, and once that door was unbolted - once Pandora's Box was opened - there was nothing to stop the continuing compromise, especially with Christians touting the very document that started them down the pernicious road on which we find ourselves today:

The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance [violated statutes, NASB], broken the everlasting covenant. (Isaiah 24:5)

Thanks to countless cases like O.J. Simpson's and Stella Liebeck's (the infamous McDonald's coffee spiller), both Christians and non-Christians are wondering what has happened to justice. Habakkuk provides the answer:

Therefore, the law is ignored And justice is never upheld. For the wicked surround the righteous; therefore, justice comes out perverted. (Habakkuk 1:4, NASB)

When the wicked surround the righteous, justice is eventually sacrificed either on the altar of public opinion or the altar of political correctness. What little righteousness the U.S. Constitution provided was negated by its unrighteousness.

Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you. For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwellingplaces that are not theirs. (Habakkuk 1:5-6)

Today's heathen also possess dwelling places that do not, by covenant, belong to them. They hold these high places due to the abdication of the true possessors. You might say that Jacob Israel has given the birthright back to Esau Edom34 without even getting back his original bowl of beans. Christians have given the Kingdom away thanks to doctrines promoting an exclusively future Kingdom, the Kingdom in heaven rather than the Kingdom of heaven, the rapture, the idea that "this world is not my home," the irrelevance of Yahweh's laws under the New Covenant, and a nearly absolute obedience to any and all government authority.

Even Benjamin Franklin understood we would eventually get what we deserved under the U.S. Constitution:

In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults ... this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.35

Franklin might well have been prophesying the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations, all of which most Americans deserved.

Habakkuk continued on the subject of the heathens who were given the Kingdom:

They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves. ...imputing this his power unto his god. (Habakkuk 1:7, 11)

The New American Standard Bible renders verse 7 more accurately:

...Their justice and authority originate with themselves. (Habakkuk 1:7, NASB)

A better description of humanism and Constitutionalism cannot be found. The Preamble declares that "WE THE PEOPLE" for various reasons do "ordain and establish this constitution...." By their silence and thus their acquiescence, the people claimed their authority, not from Yahweh, but from themselves. George Washington (who presided over the Constitutional Convention) confirmed this self-originating authority in his "Farewell Address":

This government, the offspring of our own choice uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and support.36

John Adams confessed to the same thing regarding the State Constitutions:

The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the inspiration of Heaven ... it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses.... Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone....37
Establishing Justice

According to Habakkuk, not only did the Chaldeans' authority originate with themselves, but so did their justice. And so does the justice of WE THE PEOPLE: "WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice...." What an audacious and insolent assertion! Only Yahweh is just in and of Himself, and only He can establish justice:

Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy [Yahweh's] throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face. (Psalm 18:14)

Many seek the ruler's favour; but every man's judgment [justice, NASB] cometh from YHWH. (Proverbs 29:26)

Instead of confirming the justice already established in Yahweh's perfect laws, the framers' declaration implies that justice had yet to be established. This (and other numerous confirmations throughout the Constitution) reveals that they preferred their justice to Yahweh's.

Anytime autonomous man attempts to establish justice outside Yahweh's perfect laws, it always results in injustice. It is depicted in Isaiah 5:20 as calling good evil and evil good. The word "autonomous" comes from two Greek words: auto meaning self and nomos meaning law. The word, which literally means "self law," is just another way of describing humanism or, in this instance, Constitutionalism.

Justice is defined by Random House Webster's College Dictionary:

1. the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness. 2. rightfulness or lawfulness.... 4. the quality of being true or correct. 5. the moral principle determining just conduct.... 7. the administering of deserved punishment or reward. 8. the maintenance or administration of what is just according to law....38

This is a perfect description of Yahweh and His laws, particularly from the perspective of Isaiah 33:22 and James 4:12 - that is, that there is only one lawgiver and judge. All law, righteousness, equity, morality, truthfulness, and justice originate with and emanate from Him. None of this exists outside of Yahweh and His laws, and it all existed long before 1787. Therefore, it was not lawfulness, righteousness, and justice that was established by WE THE PEOPLE, but instead lawlessness, unrighteousness, and injustice.

Christian Constitutionalists recognize this in regard to any other false god. Their unwillingness to apply the same criterion to WE THE PEOPLE is evidence that WE THE PEOPLE is indeed a god to them.

Tribunals of Injustice

Most people recognize that today's courts are tribunals of injustice. When the Constitutional framers excluded Yahweh's justice, they opened the door for justice to be defined however the judges of the United States choose to define it. In other words, the Constitution provides for justice to originate with the judges themselves.

Any constitution or government formed with designs to establish justice of itself denies and stands opposed to the Kingdom of Yeshua.39 It was Yeshua's Kingdom that was prophesied to bring about justice:

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of YHWH of hosts will perform this. (Isaiah 9:6-7)

Behold, the days come, saith YHWH, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. (Jeremiah 23:5)

Yeshua's purpose was to execute judgment and justice here on earth once His Kingdom was established, at His first advent.

The Constitutional framers clearly rejected Yeshua's government and justice, choosing instead to establish their own notion of justice. But there is no justice outside Yahweh's:

Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek YHWH.... Hearken unto me, my people; and give ear unto me, O my nation: for a law shall proceed from me, and I will make my judgment [justice, NASB] to rest for a light of the people. My righteousness is near ... my righteousness shall not be abolished. Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law.... (Isaiah 51:1-7)

Only Yahweh's subjects, who serve Him according to His perfect laws and righteous judgments, are able to render justice:

The mouth of the righteous speaketh wisdom, and his tongue talketh of judgment [justice, NASB]. The law of his God is in his heart.... (Psalm 37:30-31)

When the Constitutional framers spoke of justice in the Preamble, they were not speaking of the justice that originates with Yahweh, but rather the "justice" that originated with themselves. Otherwise, they would have followed the example of our Christian forefathers in the 1600s and early 1700s and cited or at least mentioned the laws of Yahweh upon which their justice was based.40 If the Constitutional framers had referred to Yahweh's justice, they would have at least acknowledged and honored Yahweh. But because their Constitution was a secular, pluralistic, polytheistic covenant (as especially demonstrated in Article 6 and Amendment 1), they dared not do so.

A More Perfect Union

In contrast with New Haven's 1639 Agreement ("we all agree that the scriptures hold forth a perfect rule for the direction of government"), one of the purposes for this new Constitution, as stated in the Preamble, was "to form a more perfect union." Do not overlook that "more perfect" is not the same as perfect. Neither the framers nor the U.S. Constitution nor the union they formed were perfect. Yahweh (Matthew 5:48), His knowledge (Job 31:16), His work (Deuteronomy 32:4), His way (2 Samuel 22:31), His will (Romans 12:2), and His law (Psalm 19:7) are perfect. Therefore His government must also be perfect. The question we all face is whether we really believe this.

The framers' beliefs on this matter can only be determined by their actions. Their actions make it clear that they did not believe in Yahweh's perfection. Otherwise, they, like the Puritans, would have established a government predicated solely upon the perfect laws of Yahweh. Instead, they were willing to settle for something more perfect, which is ultimately the same as less perfect.

How about us? What are we willing to settle for? As a nation, we settled for Bill Clinton, the Bushes, and Barack Obama. Why? Because like our forebears in 1 Samuel 8, Americans desire a finite flesh-and-blood president instead of the King of kings. This can only be because - despite what people may claim - they do not believe Yahweh, His way, His work, His will, His law, and His government are perfect.

Securing Liberty

As stated in the Preamble, another purpose of the United States Constitution is to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." From childhood, Americans are brainwashed to believe that, thanks to the U.S. Constitution, America is the freest nation on earth:

The media ... has played a key role in persuading people that we are the most free nation on earth. While this may or may not be true, most people have never considered this possibility: If all of the other nations were under 100% totalitarian dictatorships, and the United States of America was only under a 95% totalitarian dictatorship, it could still be said that "America is the most free nation on earth." So it is a rather meaningless boast.41

Suppose it be "the best government on earth," does that prove its own goodness, or only the badness of all other governments?42

Patrick Henry was not in the least convinced that the U.S. Constitution would secure and protect liberty; in fact, quite the opposite. Following is part of his speech to the Virginia Ratifying convention in 1788:

...I say our privileges and rights are in danger. ...the new form of Government ...will ... effectually ... oppress and ruin the people.... In some parts of the plan before you, the great rights of freemen are endangered, in other parts, absolutely taken away.... There will be no checks, no real balances, in this Government: What can avail your specious imaginary balances, your rope-dancing, chain-rattling, ridiculous ideal checks and contrivances? ...And yet who knows the dangers that this new system may produce: they are out of the sight of the common people: They cannot foresee latent consequences.... I see great jeopardy in this new Government.43

Consider carefully the empty claim of Chuck Baldwin (the Constitution Party's 2008 Presidential Candidate):

Under God, it is allegiance to the Constitution that has preserved our liberties, our peace and happiness, our security, and our very way of life. Furthermore, it is the repudiation and rejection of constitutional government that is responsible for the manner in which these very same blessings are currently being lost.44

Talk about calling evil good and good evil - or in this instance, slavery freedom and freedom slavery. The liberties once enjoyed in this nation were secured in the 1600s - not the 1700s - by means of Yahweh's perfect law of liberty - not the United States Constitution:

So shall I keep thy law continually for ever and ever. And I will walk at liberty.... (Psalm 119:44-45)

...whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed. (James 1:25)

Baldwin's claim is essentially the same as the Israelites' when Aaron fashioned the golden calf:

...they have made them a molten calf, and have worshipped it, and have sacrificed thereunto, and said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which have brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. (Exodus 32:8)

Baldwin's declaration that our liberty, peace, happiness, security, and way of life were provided by the Constitution "under God" vindicates him no more than did Aaron's attempt to name the golden calf Yahweh.

Except for occasional interference from the English kings across the Atlantic, this nation experienced its greatest liberty in the 1600s and early 1700s. From the ratification of the U.S. Constitution until now, our liberty has been slowly whittled away. At present, we would be hard-pressed to find a nation with less liberty than the United States of America. As Pastor Byles put it following the American War for Independence: "We traded one tyrant 3,000 miles away for 3,000 tyrants a mile away!"

It is extremely difficult to convince Americans they are not free. This is especially true of the average American, who is relatively well-fed, content, and even happy. But contentedness and happiness have nothing to do with freedom - a slave's a slave even if he's fat and happy. According to German author Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832), "none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

2 Corinthians 3:17 states "...where the Spirit of the Lord is there liberty." Constitutionalists can lie to themselves all they want, but the Spirit of the Lord cannot be found in the U.S. Constitution because Yahweh and His perfect laws of liberty were flagrantly disregarded.

The U.S. Constitution provided us, not with liberty, but with bondage: licenses, permits, and countless registrations, in addition to taxes on nearly everything imaginable. For anyone inclined to argue that it was not the U.S. Constitution that has brought all of this upon its subjects, please consider Matthew 7:

Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. (Matthew 7:16-18)

What has been the fruit of the United States Constitution? You only have to look at the historical record of the last 200 plus years to know that the Constitution shackled us into slavery. Man-made surrogates never have and never will provide mankind with liberty. Only Yahweh, by way of Yeshua's blood-atoning sacrifice and resurrection, can free us as individuals, and only His perfect laws of liberty can liberate us as a nation.

Americans are noted for gullibility, and their unfounded confidence in the U.S. Constitution is no exception. Because the Preamble tells them the Constitution was ordained to secure their liberty, most Americans simply take it at its word. They believe this despite the fact that the first three articles of the Constitution enslave us to an ungodly congress, president, and judicial system - something the 17th and early 18th-century Christians flourished without.

The Constitutional framers could not provide their fellow Americans with liberty for the simple reason that slaves are never able to grant freedom to fellow slaves:

These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest.... For when they speak great swelling words of vanity.... While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption.... (2 Peter 2:17-19)

The U.S. Constitution is aptly described as a well without water and the Preamble as swelling words of vanity, wholly unable to deliver their promises. In his political tract, No Treason, No. 6., The Constitution of No Authority, Libertarian attorney Lysander Spooner (1808-1887) was correct: "[the U.S. Constitution] has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it."45

The Missing God

Before leaving the Preamble, I must address the Christian Constitutionalists' Achilles' heel. The absence of any mention of Yahweh will always dog those who desperately want to make the United States Constitution either biblical or Christian. How can a document that snubs the God of the Bible be biblical? How can a document that ignores Christ be Christian?

Consider the following comment by 19th-century Presbyterian minister Alexander M'Leod:

...no consideration will justify the framers of the federal constitution, and the administration of the government in withholding any recognition of the Lord and his Anointed from the grand charter of the nation. On our daily bread, we ask a blessing. At our ordinary meals, we acknowledge the Lord of the world. We begin our last testament for disposing our worldly estates in the name of God; and shall we be guiltless, with the Bible in our hands, to disclaim the Christian religion as a body politic.46

While it is true that during the Constitutional Convention Benjamin Franklin proposed "prayers imploring the assistance of heaven, and its blessing upon our deliberations, be held in this assembly,"47 he had few supporters. Franklin wrote, "The Convention, except three or four persons, thought prayers unnecessary."48 This alone is an abomination to Yahweh:

They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. YHWH looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. (Psalm 14:1-2)

That such was a clear aberration from previous procedure was addressed by Felix R. Bunot, President of the National Convention to Secure the Religious Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, held in New York on February 26-27, 1873:

That Almighty God is the source of all civil power in the State, is not only in accordance with Holy Writ ... but it accords with the sentiment of the American people, and the duty of acknowledging Him was ever a part of their political and religious faith.... If, then, Almighty God is the source of all political power; if the individual man is bound to acknowledge his dependence on God; if the State is a personality with obligations, responsibilities and duties; if the acknowledgment of these facts is in accordance with the general prevalent practice of the Government of the United States; if it has always accorded with the spirit and conscience of the nation and the people; if we are a Christian people - let us say so [in the Preamble by amendment].49
Conclusion
The carpenter stretcheth out his rule; he marketh it out with a line; he fitteth it with planes, and he marketh it out with the compass, and maketh it after the figure of a man.... (Isaiah 44:13)

Idolatry is the epitome of stupidity. Whereas God made man in His image, man makes gods in his image. This is precisely what the Constitutional framers did when they fashioned the god they christened "WE THE PEOPLE."

Later in verse 17, Isaiah depicts idolaters praying to their god, "Deliver me; for thou are my god." This is true for Constitutionalists and non-Constitutionalists alike, as evidenced in that most people appeal to the laws of WE THE PEOPLE for deliverance rather than to laws of Yahweh. Consider carefully some of Jeremiah's poignant warnings:

Hath a nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? But my people have changed their glory for that which doth not profit. Be astonished, O ye heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid, be ye very desolate, saith YHWH. For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water. (Jeremiah 2:11-13)

....they are not valiant for the truth upon the earth; for they proceed from evil to evil, and they know not me, saith YHWH ... because they have forsaken my law which I set before them, and have not obeyed my voice, neither walked therein; but have walked after the imagination of their own heart .... which their fathers taught them.... (Jeremiah 9:3-14)

O YHWH, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps. (Jeremiah 10:23)

This last passage, by itself, denounces any contract of the people, by the people, and for the people.

At this juncture in history, most Americans are too apathetic to even read a book on this subject. The average Christian and Constitutionalist who has read this far is likely finding this a difficult message to accept. Idols are never given up easily. Like the Ephesians in Acts 19 who cried out for two hours "Great is Diana of Ephesians!", most Constitutionalists have been crying out "Great is the Constitution of the United States!" They have been doing so, not for two hours, but for over two centuries! I pray this is about to change.

2 Chronicles 7:14

Habakkuk 1 begins with the prophet wondering why Yahweh does not hear his prayers:

The burden which Habakkuk the prophet did see. O YHWH, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! Even cry out unto thee of violence, and thou wilt not save! (Habakkuk 1:1-2)

Many have had similar sentiments during the last 200-hundred plus years. Christians are incessantly claiming 2 Chronicles 7:14: "If my people, which are called by name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." Tragically, the moral climate in America is only deteriorating as time marches on. Solomon reveals the cause of America's steady decline:

He that turneth away his ear from hearing the [Yahweh's] law, even his prayer shall be abomination. (Proverb 28:9)

The Prophet Isaiah adds:

Behold, YHWH's hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; neither his ear heavy, that it cannot hear: But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear. (Isaiah 59:1-2)

2 Chronicles 7:14 has nothing to do with the heathen. It says if His people - those called by His name, those who today claim to be Christians - humble themselves, pray, and turn from their own ways to seek His ways, He will hear their prayers and heal their land. Because our prayers for national deliverance are not being answered, we have obviously failed to fulfill the requirements found in His Word. As a consequence of our rebellion, Yahweh has turned us over to be punished by our enemies, like Israel of old:

They shall be turned back, they shall be greatly ashamed, that trust in graven images, that say to the molten images [or to men whom they have made gods], Ye are our gods. Hear, ye deaf; and look, ye blind, that ye may see. Who is blind, but my servant? Or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? Who is blind as ... as YHWH's servant?... YHWH ... will magnify the law, and make it honourable. But this is a people robbed and spoiled; they are all of them snared in holes, and they are hid in prison houses: they are for a prey, and none delivereth; for a spoil, and none saith, Restore. Who among you will give ear to this? Who will hearken and hear for the time to come? Who gave Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to the robbers? Did not YHWH, he against whom we have sinned? For they would not walk in his ways, neither were they obedient unto his law. Therefore he hath poured upon him the fury of his anger ... yet he laid it not to heart. (Isaiah 42:17-25)

The Constitution of the United States represents our national idolatry, and until we repent of our veneration of WE THE PEOPLE and all it represents, we cannot expect Yahweh to hear our prayers and heal our land. In fact, we have no business even asking Him to do so.

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (140)  
Tagged with: Religion, truth, God, USA, Consitution, Law

Bible Law Vs. The United States Constitution chapter 2

Posted on Feb 7th, 2009 by Faith : Wild Child Faith



..


Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.... But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. (Matthew 6:10, 33)1

The principal objective of this book is not merely to prove the non-biblical nature of the United States Constitution, but, in so doing, to ultimately help establish Yahweh's2 Kingdom here on earth as it is in heaven, in place of today's Constitutional Republic. Therefore, before examining the Constitution by Yahweh's perfect laws, it needs to be scripturally demonstrated that Yahweh's Kingdom is already in existence both in heaven and here on earth, and that Yahweh intends His Kingdom to fill the entire earth (Isaiah 9:6-9, Zechariah 9:9-10), with His people ruling now and forever (Revelation 5:9-10).

The fact that Yahweh intends His laws to be the standard in our lives here on earth demonstrates by itself the present reality of His Kingdom. The laws by which we live are integral to the kingdom in which we live and to which we are loyal. This was certainly understood by the antagonists of the 1st-century Christians:


But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason ... crying, These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also ... and these all do contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, one Jesus. (Acts 17:5-7)

Let me say it again: The laws by which we live determine which king we serve and to which kingdom we are loyal.

Yahweh's Eternal Kingdom


Because Yahweh is the creator of the entire universe (Jeremiah 10:12), He is sovereign over the entire universe (Deuteronomy 10:14), and because Yahweh is sovereign over the entire universe, He is also King over the entire universe, time without end:


Thine, O YHWH,3 is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O YHWH, and thou art exalted as head above all. ...thou reignest over all; and in thine hand is power and might; and in thine hand it is to make great, and to give strength unto all. (1 Chronicles 29:11-12)
For God is the King of all the earth.... God reigneth over the heathen: God sitteth upon the throne of his holiness. (Psalm 47:7-8)
YHWH hath prepared his throne in the heavens; and his kingdom ruleth over all. (Psalm 103:19)
...his kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and his dominion is from generation to generation. ...the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men. (Daniel 4:3, 17)
...He is the living God, and stedfast for ever, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed, and his dominion shall be even unto the end. (Daniel 6:26)

Yahweh rules from heaven, but His dominion includes the entire universe. At no point in time has Yahweh abdicated His throne, which means He is as much King now as He was at the beginning of creation. Furthermore, if Yahweh is a perpetual King, then the Kingdom He rules over must also be perpetual.


YHWH is King for ever and ever.... (Psalm 10:16)
...YHWH is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king.... (Jeremiah 10:10)
Thou, O YHWH, remainest for ever; thy throne from generation to generation. (Lamentations 5:19)
Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and thy dominion endureth throughout all generations. (Psalm 145:13)
Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen. (1 Timothy 1:17)

Many Christians4 reject these inescapable facts of Yahweh's sovereignty, believing that He has no Kingdom at present or that His Kingdom is limited to heaven. Their favorite proof text is lifted from John 18:


Yeshua answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. (John 18:36)

The exact same Greek phrase ek toú kósmou, translated "not of this world," is used several times and explained in the preceding chapter:


I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.... As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world. (John 17:14-18)

Clearly ek toú kósmou in John 18:36 does not mean that Yahweh's Kingdom exists only in heaven. Although it is certainly true that His Kingdom is not of this world, this does not mean that He does not intend for it to be in this world. In other words, His Kingdom is nothing like the other kingdoms in this world. As someone once said, "The only kingdom that will prevail in this world is the kingdom that is not of this world."

Christians who have rejected Yahweh's extant Kingdom here on earth are looking for a future king and a future kingdom. This theology has nearly destroyed Yahweh's Kingdom, at least in practice, here on earth. It is certainly one of the principal reasons why the antichrists and non-Christians rule today.

This anti-kingdom theology has also been one of the prime contributors to today's fulfillment of Yeshua's5 warning in Matthew 5:


Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. (Matthew 5:13)

Yeshua's statement is a fulfillment of one of Yahweh's promised curses in Deuteronomy 28:


But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of YHWH thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall come upon thee.... The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low.... Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which YHWH shall send against thee.... (Deuteronomy 28:15, 43-48)

One cannot get any lower than beneath the feet of those who rule over you. Rejecting Yahweh, His Kingdom, and His laws has always been prime cause for His people's calamities:


...they were disobedient, and rebelled against thee, and cast thy law behind their backs, and ... thy prophets ... testifiedst against them, that thou mightest bring them again unto thy law: yet they dealt proudly, and hearkened not unto thy commandments, but sinned against thy judgments, (which if a man do, he shall live in them;) and withdrew the shoulder, and hardened their neck, and would not hear.... Neither have our kings, our princes, our priests, nor our fathers, kept thy law, nor hearkened unto thy commandments and thy testimonies, wherewith thou didst testify against them. For they have not served thee in their kingdom.... (Nehemiah 9:26-29, 34-35)

The same is as true today as it was in Nehemiah's day. On the other hand, when Yahweh's subjects are diligent to observe His commandments, statutes, and judgments, Yahweh promises His people dominion rather than servitude:


And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently unto the voice of YHWH thy God, to observe and to do all his commandments which I command thee this day, that YHWH thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth: And all these blessings shall come on thee, and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of YHWH thy God. (Deuteronomy 28:1-2)
(For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ; and having in a readiness to revenge [punish, NASB] all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled. (2 Corinthians 10:4-6)
But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;) and hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly [high] places in Christ Jesus. (Ephesians 2:4-6)
And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth. (Revelation 5:10)

Christians who reject Yahweh's laws, abdicate dominion and choose servitude to their enemies thereby relinquishing Yahweh's earthly Kingdom to His enemies. The idea that Yahweh's Kingdom - even here on earth - is ruled by His enemies will sound strange to some Christians, but the following two passages demonstrate this reality:


And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force. (Matthew 11:12)
Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat.... But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. (Matthew 23:1-13)

Neither of these passages can be referring to the Kingdom in heaven. Instead, they refer to the Kingdom of heaven here on earth. These two passages alone should provide today's Christians with an entirely different perspective of Yahweh's Kingdom.

The only difference between what was occurring in Yeshua's day and what has occurred in modern times is that Yahweh's enemies have not needed to take the Kingdom by force. Because Christianity is glutted with doctrines proclaiming that Yahweh's laws are irrelevant under the New Covenant, that Christians are obligated to keep all of man's laws,6 and that the Kingdom is yet to come or that it is found exclusively in heaven, the Kingdom has been handed over to Yahweh's enemies without so much as a struggle. Because most pastors have colluded with the Internal Revenue Service in exchange for their 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, they have turned over the jurisdiction and ultimate control of even their churches and ministries to today's antichristian government.7

Yahweh's Kingdom Relationship With Israel


Although it is true that the Old Testament contains many prophecies regarding a future Kingdom, this in no way detracts from the fact that Yahweh was, is, and always will be King. The prophecies in question concern Yahweh's special New Covenant kingdom relationship with a remnant of His people Israel, as made possible through Yeshua the Christ. This kingdom relationship is indicative of His marital relationship with Israelites. Originally, this marital relationship existed between Him and the entire nation of Israelites:


And YHWH said unto me ... Israel ... I am married unto you.... (Jeremiah 3:11-14)

In the book of Exodus, Moses recorded Yahweh's marriage proposal to all twelve tribes of the nation of Israel:


Ye have seen ... how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself. Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people.... And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel. (Exodus 19:4-6)

This is the first time the word "kingdom," used in reference to Yahweh's Kingdom, appears in the Bible. Yahweh established a kingdom relationship between Himself and the nation of Israel when He married her at Mt. Sinai. In Ezekiel 16, Yahweh provided a second witness to the affinity between His Kingdom and His marriage to Israel:


Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord YHWH, and thou becamest mine ... and thou didst prosper into a kingdom. (Ezekiel 16:8-13)

King David commented upon this kingdom relationship:


....let them know that God ruleth in Jacob unto the ends of the earth. (Psalm 59:13)

While wrestling with an angel, Jacob was given the name "Israel" because this name means "power" or "ruling with El" (Genesis 32:28). El is the abbreviated form of the Hebrew Elohiym, which is translated God. Yahweh Elohiym married the twelve tribes of Israel, thereby making her His helpmeet. As both His wife and His queen, she ruled with El over His Kingdom and was thus named Isra El - ruling with God.

Later, however, because the ten-tribed house of Israel worshiped other gods, an act Yahweh identified as adultery or breaking wedlock, he divorced and put her away:


And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce.... (Jeremiah 3:8)

Yahweh declared to Hosea that as a result of His divorcing the house of Israel, she would no longer be His people. He stripped that house of her name, and her kingdom relationship with Him ceased to exist:


And YHWH said unto him, ... I will ... cause to cease the kingdom of the house of Israel.... Then said God, ... ye are not my people, and I will not be your God. (Hosea 1:4-9)

Yahweh's subsequent divorce of the two-tribed house of Judah was prophesied in 2 Kings 23 and Ezekiel 16:


And YHWH said, I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there. (2 Kings 23:27)
And I will judge thee, as women that break wedlock [break covenant, verse 59].... (Ezekiel 16:38)

Like the house of Israel in Hosea 1, the removal of the Kingdom from the house of Judah, prophesied by Yeshua in Matthew 21, is equivalent to Judah's divorce:


Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. (Matthew 21:43)

The nation to whom the kingdom was given is identified by the Apostle Peter as the elect (a remnant) of the Israelites - with whom the New Covenant was made, according to Hebrew 8:8 - who are sanctified by the blood of Yeshua:


Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ.... (1 Peter 1:1-2)

The English word "scattered" is translated from the Greek word diasporas. Strong's Concordance defines diasporas:


...dispersion, i.e. (spec. and conc.) the converted Isr. resident in Gentile countries.8

Diaspora is the same Greek word used in James 1:1 in the phrase "to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad," and by the translators of the Septuagint Old Testament in Deuteronomy 28:25, 30:4; Nehemiah 1:8; and Psalm 147:2 for the dispersion of the Old Testament Israelites.

The Greek word parepideémois, translated "strangers" in 1 Peter 1:1, conveys a similar thought:


...an alien alongside, i.e. a resident foreigner.9
...one who comes from a foreign country into a city or land to reside there by the side of the natives; hence stranger; sojourning in a strange place, a foreigner....10

In other words, Peter wrote his first epistle to Israelite foreigners living among the native residents of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia - the precise locations to which the house of Israel had been initially dispersed after Yahweh divorced them. It was to these Christian Israelites that Peter wrote the following in Chapter 2:


But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people.... Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy. (1 Peter 2:9-10)

The first phrase in verse 9 is a quotation from Exodus 19:5-6, in which Yahweh first proposed marriage to the nation of Israel. The last two phrases in verse 10 are quotations from Hosea 1:9 and 2:23, in which Yahweh promised to remarry Israel and ultimately restore His kingdom relationship with a remnant of Israelites from both the house of Israel and the house of Judah under the New Covenant. It is this remnant that forms the nation prophesied by Yeshua in Matthew 21:43 and to whom the Kingdom was given.11

The prophets foretold this same special New Covenant kingdom relationship between Yahweh and Israel:


I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days.... And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.... But the saints of the most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.... Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.... And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him. (Daniel 7:13-27)

In Psalm 148 and Revelation 12 and 14, the saints of the Most High are identified as Israelites:


He also exalteth the horn of his people, the praise of all his saints; even of the children of Israel, a people near unto him. Praise ye YHWH. (Psalm 148:14)
And the dragon was wroth with the woman [Israel], and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. (Revelation 12:17)
Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. (Revelation 14:12)

This is precisely who the Apostles understood the saints to be. In anticipation of the fulfillment of numerous Old Testament prophesies concerning the Kingdom being restored to Israel, they questioned Yeshua as to the specific timing of the restoration - which they knew, from the Prophet Daniel, was to occur sometime during the days of the Roman Empire (Daniel 2:36-44, 7:13-27):


Then they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? (Acts 1:6)

Because many people have misidentified today's Jews12 as Israelites and because the Jews have rejected Yeshua and His Kingdom, much of Christianity has come to the erroneous conclusion that this restored kingdom relationship with Israel has yet to occur. However, the New Testament declares that this kingdom relationship is not something yet to occur, but that it has existed since the second chapter of Acts when the first Judahite Israelites, in faith and repentance, were immersed into Christ (Acts 2:36-41).13 Yahweh reigns now, both in heaven and on earth, through Yeshua the Christ, and Christians are a part of His kingdom now, in heaven and here on earth.

Before the events in the book of Acts, John the Baptist, Yeshua, and the Apostles all preached that the Kingdom of God was at hand:


In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea, and saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven14 is at hand. (Matthew 3:1-2)
From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. (Matthew 4:17)
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, ...But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. (Matthew 10:5-7)

The Apostles were told that some of them would live to see the Kingdom restored:


And he [Yeshua] said unto them [His disciples], Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power. (Mark 9:1)

The Apostles anticipated the restored Kingdom in Acts 1, and in Acts 2 it was indeed restored with power on the day of Pentecost.

Following the events in Acts 2, the 1st-century Christians proclaimed Yeshua to be a reigning King and the saints themselves to be citizens of the Kingdom - not sometime yet future, but then and there:


But the Jews which believed not ... set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason ... crying, These that have turned the world upside down are come hither also; whom Jason hath received: and these all do contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, one Jesus. (Acts 17:5-7)
Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son. In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins.... (Colossians 1:12-14)
As ye know how we exhorted and comforted and charged every one of you, as a father doth his children, that ye would walk worthy of God, who hath called you unto his kingdom and glory. (1 Thessalonians 2:11-12)
I John, who also am your brother, and companion [fellow partaker, NASB] in tribulation, and in the kingdom.... (Revelation 1:9)

Do not overlook that in Acts 17:7, the disciples were described as already serving Yeshua as their King on earth, according to His laws. The very fact that Rome persecuted, imprisoned, and murdered Christians demonstrates that the Romans understood that the Kingdom the Christians preached was an extant rival kingdom. If it had been otherwise - had Christianity been merely a religion - Rome would not have concerned itself with Christianity anymore than it did with myriad other religions existing in its realm at the same time. It was Christendom's King, His Kingdom, and His laws that posed a threat to the Roman Empire. This was the Kingdom Daniel prophesied would be set up during the Roman Empire.


And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever. (Daniel 2:44)

The Colossians passage demands that if the Kingdom of Yeshua is not in existence now, then redemption and forgiveness of sins are not yet valid. If the Kingdom is yet future, no one has been delivered from the power of darkness nor partaken of the inheritance of the saints. In short, no one has yet become a Christian.

The Kingdom is currently under the rule of non-Christians, not because it has yet to be established, but rather because Christians have abdicated their position as leaders of society. Consequently, the church has become governmentally and culturally impotent.

Pursuing the Kingdom


Because the Kingdom of God is in existence today, our principal objective as Christians should be to please our King. We should be pursuing His Kingdom - taking dominion and implementing His perfect laws everywhere we possibly can, including government:


But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness [found in His perfect laws, Isaiah 51:7-8].... (Matthew 6:33)

Seek His Kingdom where? The same place He told His disciples, earlier in the same chapter, when teaching them to pray:


...pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. (Matthew 6:9-10)

The few Christians who understand the present reality of Yahweh's Kingdom here on earth seldom see its relevance beyond the four walls of their homes or church buildings. This limited vision is usually the consequence of antinomianism. However, Yahweh's will is that His Kingdom, operating under His perfect laws, be established here on earth as it is in heaven. There is nowhere in heaven where Yahweh does not reign, nor where His Kingdom cannot be found, nor where His laws are not intact. This is His will for earth as well, but He has left to His subjects the task of fully establishing His kingdom on earth:


Ye are blessed of YHWH which made heaven and earth. The heaven, even the heavens, are YHWH's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men. (Psalm 115:15-16)

Although it is true that the earth was made for all of mankind to inhabit, no Christian in his right mind would maintain that Yahweh intends for non-Christians to reign over Christians, except as a judgment against saltless, impotent Christianity.

The dominion mandate was given to Adam and his descendants, particularly Christians under the New Covenant. Yahweh intends for His subjects to inherit the earth:


But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace.... For such as be blessed of him shall inherit the earth; and they that be cursed of him shall be cut off.... The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever.... Wait on YHWH, and keep his way, and he shall exalt thee to inherit the land: when the wicked are cut off, thou shalt see it. (Psalm 37:11-34)
Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. (Matthew 5:5)

These promises are conditional. We, as a people, must first return to Yahweh and His laws if we expect Him to fulfill His promises. Inherent in the dominion mandate is Yahweh's expectation for His people to maintain, protect, and increase their holdings in furtherance of His Kingdom here on earth even as it is in heaven.

Yahweh has given us the Kingdom, but modern Christians have squandered it and handed it over to His enemies. This abdication has occurred for two principal reasons: 1) their belief that Yahweh's perfect laws have been abolished under the New Covenant, 2) modern Christianity's teachings that the Kingdom is yet future and exclusively in heaven. Non-Christians and antichrists have been delighted to fill the void with their idols, their laws, and their governments.

If This is the Kingdom?


Some people respond to these ideas of a present Kingdom by retorting that if this is His Kingdom, who wants it? The blame for the deplorable state of the Kingdom belongs not to God, but to Christians who are so heavenly minded that they are of no earthly good. Christianity is full of savorless salt that is good for nothing but to be trampled under the foot of man. That Christianity has become savorless is demonstrated in that Christians today are the "trampled" rather than the "tramplers." This is also the reason why what used to be known as Christendom (short for Christian dominion) is now known as simply Christianity, or worse as Judeo-Christianity.15

That Yahweh expects His people to be the "tramplers" is not only evident in Matthew 5, but also in Revelation 5:


...Thou ... hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; and hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth. (Revelation 5:9-10)

Paul wrote to the Corinthian Christians that "I would to God ye did reign...." (1 Corinthians 4:8) To reign is equivalent with being the tramplers, as prophesied by Zechariah:


And they [the house of Judah and the house of Israel, verse 6] shall be as mighty men, which tread down their enemies in the mire of the streets in the battle: and they shall fight, because YHWH is with them.... (Zechariah 10:5)

To reign means to rule, and to rule means to establish the law of the land:


For YHWH will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel ... and they shall rule over their oppressors. (Isaiah 14:1-2)

Solomon understood the importance of godly rulers:


When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn. (Proverbs 29:2)

While many Christians appear to be peering into heaven and wondering when Yahweh is going to clean up this mess, they might want to consider that perhaps Yahweh is looking down upon us and wondering when we, His subjects, are going to clean it up. After all, Yahweh is not the one responsible for making a mess of things. He has already given us the tools by which to right society, if we would only believe in Him and His perfect laws. Every generation that rejects Yahweh's plan for the Kingdom is simply another generation destined to live under the heel of non-Christian dominion.

Restoration of the Kingdom will not happen overnight. The few today, who understand the Kingdom of Yahweh, are beginning to prepare the ground for a future generation of our progeny. This preparation begins with convincing modern Christianity that they are supposed to be ruling instead of serving the non-Christians and antichrists. Eventually, Christendom will be able to establish and prosper into the Kingdom (Ezekiel 16:13) that Yahweh intends us to be.

Our National Exodus


When Christians finally come to their senses and realize that Yahweh's kingdom plan is meant to take place here and now, they will also understand that all other kingdoms or governments, including America's Constitutional Republic, are rival kingdoms.

Constitutionalists are constantly calling for a return to the United States Constitution as the solution to all of our national problems. What they do not realize is that the U.S. Constitution was the catalyst for our national exodus from Yahweh's perfect laws and, consequently, Yahweh's Kingdom here on earth. The Constitution is not the solution, but instead the origin and the prime cause of our national problems. Any return to it will, at best, provide only a temporary fix to some of the issues we face today. Ultimately, it will only postpone the inevitable downfall of today's Constitutional Republic (Matthew 7:26-27), and today's problems will be transferred to a future generation of Christians.

The U.S. Constitution represents the lust of our hearts:


I am YHWH thy God.... But my people would not hearken to my voice; and Israel would none of me. So I gave them up unto their own hearts' lust: and they walked in their own counsels. (Psalm 81:10-12)

1 Samuel provides a classic example of what is described in Psalm 81:


Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel unto Ramah, and said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us like all the nations. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said, Give us a king to judge us. And Samuel prayed unto YHWH. And YHWH said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. According to all the works which they have done since the day that I brought them up out of Egypt even unto this day, wherewith they have forsaken me, and served other gods.... (1 Samuel 8:4-8)

Yahweh gave the Israelites the desire of their hearts, even when their desires were wickedness:


...ye said unto me, Nay; but a king shall reign over us: when YHWH your God was your king. ...your wickedness is great, which ye have done in the sight of YHWH, in asking you a king. (1 Samuel 12:12, 17)

If our desire - personally or nationally - is to serve Yahweh as King, He will make it possible for us to do so. He will give us the desires of our heart and reward us accordingly. But if our desire is to serve some false god or another king and his laws, Yahweh will make that possible as well and reward us accordingly:


And I gave them my statutes, and shewed them my judgments, which if a man do, he shall even live in them.... But the house of Israel rebelled against me in the wilderness: they walked not in my statutes, and they despised my judgments ... then I said, I would pour out my fury upon them, to accomplish my anger against them in the wilderness.... Because they had not executed my judgments, but had despised my statutes, and had polluted my sabbaths, and their eyes were after their fathers' idols. Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live. (Ezekiel 20:11-25)

These are timeless principles:


With the merciful thou [Yahweh] wilt shew thyself merciful, and with the upright man thou wilt shew thyself upright. With the pure thou wilt shew thyself pure; and with the froward thou wilt shew thyself unsavoury. (2 Samuel 22:26-27)

The Same Old Sin


What occurred in 1 Samuel 8 was not a one-time event. The Prophet Hosea describes the same thing happening in his day. Hosea 1 delineates the divorce of the house of Israel and prophesies their New Covenant restoration with Yahweh and with the house of Judah. Most of the remainder of the book expounds upon Yahweh's reasons for divorcing Israel and removing her from her kingdom-relationship with Him:


My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee ... seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. (Hosea 4:6)

Israel lost everything because they broke covenant with their God, King, and Husband:


Ephraim [the principal and representative tribe of the house of Israel] is oppressed and broken in judgment, because he willingly walked after the commandment [of men]. (Hosea 5:11)
...He [Yahweh] shall come as an eagle against the house of YHWH, because they have transgressed my covenant, and trespassed against my law.... I have written to him the great things of my law, but they were counted as a strange thing. (Hosea 8:1, 12)

Rejection of Yahweh's law is tantamount to rejecting Yahweh as King:


They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not.... (Hosea 8:4)

The outcome was the same as in 1 Samuel 8 when Yahweh gave them the lusts of their heart:


...the Assyrian shall be his king, because they refused to return [to Yahweh]. (Hosea 11:5)

When Isra El - she who is meant to rule with El - as His wife and queen, rejected Him for other kings, she not only rejected Him as her King, but also as her God and Husband. In so doing, she became a whore in her Husband's sight:


How weak is thine heart, saith the Lord YHWH, seeing thou doest all these things, the work of an imperious whorish woman; in that thou buildest thine eminent place in the head of every way, and makest thine high place in every street; and hast not been as an harlot, in that thou scornest hire; but as a wife that committeth adultery, which taketh strangers instead of her husband! (Ezekiel 16:30-32)

When Israel demanded another king in 1 Samuel 8, she was in effect demanding another husband. She committed whoredom then and every time since when she has repeated her sin.

Here in America, we resurrect and reenact this same sin every four years when Christians and non-Christians alike clamor for and elect another replacement for the King of kings. It was whoredom then and it is whoredom today when we elect someone who upholds some other law than Yahweh's.

Christians need to stop sugarcoating our American forefathers' sin. The ratification of the U.S. Constitution was just another incident of the same sin recorded in 1 Samuel 8 and in the book of Hosea. It was idolatry and therefore spiritual whoredom against Yahweh our God and sedition against His Kingdom. It is no different for today's constitutionalists.

Dominion for Our Progeny


My ultimate objective with this book is to awaken today's Christians to what they should already understand - that Yahweh, His Kingdom, and His laws are perfect - in order to prepare tomorrow's Christians to take dominion of Yahweh's Kingdom here on earth, established, implemented, and executed solely upon His laws.

If I cannot change the eschatology of those Christians who believe Yahweh's Kingdom has yet to appear - and have therefore trapped themselves in cultural paralysis - then let me at least appeal to common sense. In the time between now and forever, would you not prefer to live by Yahweh's perfect laws of liberty than by man's laws of bondage?

Although many Christians may not be politically active themselves, they are nonetheless always hoping, praying, and voting for those they trust will improve their standard of living. A higher standard of living will never be achieved through man's laws and the oppression of ever-encroaching government. I am asking that we set aside our eschatological differences (Yahweh will take care of the eschatological future) and work together for liberty and justice through the only means possible - Yahweh's Kingdom and His laws - so that, at the very least, we can help make His Kingdom on earth as it is in heaven a reality for our progeny.


All thy works shall praise thee, O YHWH; and thy saints shall bless thee. They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom, and talk of thy power; to make known to the sons of men his mighty acts, and the glorious majesty of his kingdom. (Psalm 145:10-12)

Pursuing Yahweh's Kingdom begins by speaking of its glory and power to sons of men. This is the very least we can do as Yahweh's ambassadors, and it is something all of us can do. On the other hand, Constitutionalism needs to be exposed for what it is - idolatrous apostasy. Constitutionalism amounts to idolatry because idolatry is not about statues so much as statutes. Anyone defending and promoting "laws" 16 other than Yahweh's is not serving Yahweh nor seeking His Kingdom.

Among other more specific concerns, the following unbiblical characteristics, embodied in the United States Constitution, will be exposed in the chapters to follow:


  • The Preamble's substitution of a new national god for Yahweh.
  • Article 1's usurpation of Yahweh's legislative powers.
  • Article 2's commandeering of Yahweh's executive sovereignty.
  • Article 3's supplanting of Yahweh's judgments.
  • Article 6's repudiation of Christianity.
  • Amendment 1's promotion of pluralism, polytheism, and idolatry.
  • Amendment 10's promotion of humanism.

Let us stop accepting and promoting man-made, second-rate substitutions. May Yahweh open our eyes that we may see the possibilities of His Kingdom and His perfect laws. May He grant us the same fervor for Him and His Kingdom as the liberals have for their democracy and the Constitutionalists have for their Constitutional Republic:


And YHWH stirred up the spirit of ... all the remnant of the people; and they came and did work in the house of YHWH of hosts, their God. (Haggai 1:14)

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (108)  
Tagged with: Religion, truth, God, USA, Consitution, Law

Bible Law Vs. The United States Constitution ( A Christain Veiw)

Posted on Feb 2nd, 2009 by Faith : Wild Child Faith
 

Preface


Why is it that Americans - Christians1 in particular - have such a love affair with the United States Constitution? Is it because we have been told repeatedly that it is one of the most important documents ever written by man? Is it because it was based upon biblical principles and is a great Christian document? Or is it because the victors in the culture war wrote our history the way they wanted us to perceive it?

Most Americans never wonder about these things. They believe what they have been taught about the founding of our government and are quite content to leave it at that (Proverbs 14:15). With this book, I hope, at the very least, to motivate people to think about the Constitution, a document which few Americans have read and to which fewer yet have given any serious thought. More importantly, I hope to inspire you to study Yahweh's2 laws and to esteem them as did the Psalmist, who declared his love for the law seven times in Psalm 119. I also hope to create a vision for Yahweh's kingdom here on earth as it is in heaven (Matthew 6:10).

If this is ever to be accomplished, Americans must first recognize and repent of their national idolatry - their love affair with the humanistic, pluralistic, polytheistic, and antichristian United States Constitution. Although Christians expose and combat sin on many fronts, very few identify the U.S. Constitution as an idol of national prominence. Fewer yet understand the biblical solution. As Henry David Thoreau put it, "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." The Constitution is not the only root of evil in the American system of government, but it is one of the more consequential ones.

If you are a person who values truth above all else and who chooses to sacrifice doctrine on the altar of sacred truth - instead of sacrificing truth on the altar of sacred doctrine - your beliefs concerning the U.S. Constitution and the Holy Bible may be challenged and perhaps radically changed by what you read in the following pages.

This book is dedicated first to Yahweh, the one and only God, King, Judge, and Lawgiver and to Yeshua,3 our one and only Lord and Savior. Secondly, it is dedicated to a future generation of our progeny, who will erect a theocracy based solely upon Yahweh's perfect law. Lord willing, an irrepressible movement will one day sweep across the country in fulfillment of Matthew 6:10, 33:

Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.... But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. (Matthew 6:10, 33)4

Chapter 1
The Perfect Law of Yahweh

Before examining the United States Constitution by Yahweh's laws, it must first be demonstrated that those laws are the perfect standard by which the U.S. Constitution should be judged:

The law of YHWH5 is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of YHWH is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of YHWH are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of YHWH is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of YHWH is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of YHWH are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward. (Psalm 19:7-11)

In all but a very few instances, I am certain that modern-day conservative, fundamental Christians would profess that Yahweh's laws are perfect. Nevertheless, I am equally certain that few of them truly believe that these verses from Psalm 19 have any practical value today. For the most part, today's Christians are antinomian, believing that Yahweh's law have little relevance to the New Covenant Christian, or they believe the law has been abolished altogether.6

What irony! Many Christians identify themselves as New Testament or New Covenant Christians and yet they reject the foundation of the New Covenant:

Behold, the days come, saith YHWH, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith YHWH: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; after those days, saith YHWH, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. (Jeremiah 31:31-33)

According to the Prophet Jeremiah and the author of Hebrews, who quoted this prophecy in Hebrews 8:8-10, the New Covenant is Yahweh's laws written on the hearts and minds of His New Covenant people,7 to the end that the same laws be put into daily practice. Therefore, it is impossible to be a New Covenant Christian without pursuing Yahweh's laws individually and ultimately in society as a whole.

Antinomians quote select New Testament passages, which appear to abolish the laws of Yahweh, while completely ignoring the plethora of New Testament passages that declare Yahweh's laws inherent to the New Covenant. The tragic consequences of this theology, which pits Scripture against Scripture, are found in the following list. If you believe the laws of Yahweh have been abolished under the New Covenant and you have consequently neglected to pursue His laws in your own life:

  • You believe heaven and earth have passed away.
  • You are, at best, least in the Kingdom of heaven.
  • You are not accomplishing Yahweh's will.
  • You are not known by Yahweh and will never live in His presence.
  • You do not love Yeshua.
  • You do not abide in Yeshua's love.
  • You do not believe the truth.
  • You believe there is no such thing as sin.
  • You fail to exhibit true faith.
  • You do not believe in what is holy, just, and good.
  • You do not believe in what is spiritual.
  • You are not living righteously.
  • You are not walking after the Spirit.
  • You are carnal and at enmity with Yahweh.
  • You are not pleasing to God.
  • You do not believe in God's goodness.
  • You do not believe in the New Covenant.
  • You are not a New Covenant Christian.
  • You do not know Yahweh.
  • You cannot sin, and, therefore, do not need Yeshua as your Savior.
  • You do not love the children of Yahweh.
  • You do not love Yahweh.
  • You are not a part of Yahweh's New Covenant remnant.
  • You are not one of Yahweh's saints.
  • You have no right to the tree of life.

These conclusions are drawn from the following New Testament passages:

For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (Mathew 5:18)

Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:19)

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? And in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity [anomian - lawlessness]. (Matthew 7:21-23)

And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail. (Luke 16:17)

If ye love me, keep my commandments. (John 14:15)

If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love.... (John 15:10)

...truth [is] in the law. (Romans 2:20)

...by the law is the knowledge of sin. (Romans 3:20)

Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. (Romans 3:31)

What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (Romans 7:7)

Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. (Romans 7:12)

For we know that the law is spiritual.... (Romans 7:14)

That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. (Romans 8:4)

Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. (Romans 8:7)

Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God. (1 Corinthians 7:19)

But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully. (1 Timothy 1:8)

For this is the [New] covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith YHWH; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people. (Hebrews 8:10)

And hereby we do know that we know him [Yahweh], if we keep his commandments. (1 John 2:3)

Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. (1 John 3:4)

By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. (1 John 5:2)

For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. (1 John 5:3)

And this is love, that we walk after his commandments.... (2 John 1:6)

And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. (Revelation 12:17)

Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. (Revelation 14:12)

Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. (Revelation 22:14)

Under Law or Under Grace

None of this is to say that Christians are under the law as were the Israelites during the Old, or what is otherwise known as the Mosaic, Covenant. The Bible is very clear that New Covenant Christians are not under the law, but under grace (Romans 6:14). This simply means that we are no longer required to perfectly keep all of Yahweh's moral laws for righteousness as were the Israelites living under the Mosaic Covenant:

And YHWH commanded us [Old Covenant Israelites] to do all these statutes, to fear YHWH our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive, as it is at this day. And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before YHWH our God, as he hath commanded us. (Deuteronomy 6:24-25)

For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. (Galatians 3:10)

It was particularly this aspect of the Mosaic Covenant that Yeshua fulfilled on our behalf and then abolished:

For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. (Romans 10:4)

In Galatians 3:11, the Apostle Paul wrote that "no man is justified by the law in the sight of God..." and in Galatians 5:4 that "you [are] severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law, you have fallen from grace." Justification (our legal standing before Yahweh) is what provides us our righteousness (our moral standing before Him). Justification, and thereby, righteousness, is only attainable through Yeshua's propitiating sacrifice on our behalf.

Having fulfilled the Old Covenant requirement of perfect righteousness - perfect obedience to Yahweh's laws, which equates with sinlessness - Yeshua became our righteousness (1 Corinthians 1:26-31). Consequently, "every one that believeth"8 is justified by the blood-atoning sacrifice and resurrection of Yeshua the Christ and is no longer under the law, but under grace.

This has been perverted to mean that Yahweh's laws themselves have been abolished. If this were true, Yeshua would have put an end to Yahweh's morality, which would mean that Yeshua would have put an end to Yahweh. What a horrific concept!

Because Yahweh does not change (Malachi 3:6), His morality, or righteousness, has not changed either:

The works of YHWH are great ... and his righteousness endureth for ever. (Psalm 111:2-3)

Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and thy law is the truth. (Psalm 119:142)

Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law ... my righteousness shall be for ever.... (Isaiah 51:7-8)

Because Yahweh's laws reflect His unchanging morality, His laws cannot be abolished or altered. To put it another way, if Yahweh's laws are imperfect, as some modern Christians seem to believe, then so is Yahweh's morality. If Yahweh's morality is imperfect so is Yahweh. And if Yahweh, His laws, and His morality are all imperfect then Yahweh is unrighteous. Not so:

...YHWH is upright ... and there is no unrighteousness in him. (Psalm 92:15)

YHWH is righteous in all his ways, and holy in all his works. (Psalm 145:17)

Yahweh is perpetually righteous and holy and, therefore, what He deemed sin formerly is still sin under the New Covenant.

This is not to say that no changes have occurred between the Mosaic and the Christian Covenants. The Mosaic Covenant required perfect obedience to obtain an imperfect justification. When the people fell short, the priests sacrificed sheep and cattle. It was not until Yeshua's blood-atoning sacrifice (Galatians 3:22-24, Hebrews 9:13-15) that those living during the Mosaic Covenant, as well as those of us called under the New Covenant, could obtain perfect justification. Thus, the Mosaic Covenant's Levitical priesthood and its sacrificial system have been fulfilled by Yeshua and are no longer in effect today.

Christians are not under the law as were the Mosaic Israelites. We strive to keep the moral laws of Yahweh out of our love for Him and our fellow man:

Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love YHWH thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. (Matthew 22:37-40)

Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. (Romans 13:8-10)

To fulfill the law is to love Yahweh and our neighbor. A lawless Christian (an antinomian) is at best an oxymoron. According to Jude, antinomians deny both Yahweh and Yeshua by their ungodly theology:

Beloved, ... I ... write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. (Jude 1:3-4)

Where the King James translated asélgeian "lasciviousness," the New American Standard Bible translates it "licentiousness." In his 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster defined "licentious" and "licentiousness":

1. Using license; indulging freedom to excess; unrestrained by law.... 2. Exceeding the limits of law....9

1. Excessive indulgence of liberty; contempt of the just restraints of law....10

Those definitions perfectly describe antinomians. These people turn Yahweh's grace into licentiousness through their disregard of His law. In reality, antinomians are humanists dressed in Christian attire. Without Yahweh's moral compass, every man is a law unto himself.

The antithesis of Yahweh's law is not grace, but instead lawlessness and, therefore, sin. Yahweh's laws are the means to keep us from sinning; grace is the solution after we have sinned.

Galatians 3

Those who believe Yahweh's laws are no longer applicable under the New Covenant often cite Paul's epistle to the Galatians:

But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. (Galatians 3:23-35)

Antinomians are quick to announce, "See, the law is no longer for today!" However, it must be asked, "Which law is no longer for today?" The Greek word nomos, from which the New Testament word "law" is translated, has a variety of New Testament applications that can only be determined by the context of each passage in which nomos appears:

  1. Any law whatsoever.
  2. The law of Yeshua the Christ.
  3. The entire Old Testament, including the Psalms and the Prophets.
  4. The Pentateuch, that is, the first five books of the Old Testament.
  5. The Mosaic Covenant, including its sacrificial and ceremonial laws.
  6. The sacrifices and/or ceremonial components of the Mosaic Covenant.
  7. The moral laws of Yahweh as contained in His commandments, statutes, and judgments.
  8. One of the three divisions of the laws of Yahweh - that is, the commandments or the statutes, or the judgments.

Antinomians usually believe Paul was referring to some combination of Numbers 6 and 7. They make the same application to most of the New Testament passages that, upon a cursory reading, appear to state that Yahweh's law has been abolished. Most of these people have not been taught that other options exist.

The Correct Choice

We must be careful to determine which law the Apostle Paul is referring to, otherwise, it may appear that Paul is contradicting himself. For example, in Galatians 3, Paul wrote that because faith had come, Christians are no longer under the schoolmaster (the law). However, in Romans 3, Paul appears to contradict himself:

Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law. (Romans 3:31)

Either Paul was talking about two different laws or He was uninspired, as some people have tragically concluded. If we do not correctly identify the law to which Yeshua put an end in Galatians 3, we may believe Paul to be odds not only with himself but with Yeshua:

For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:18-19)

Either Paul was not referring to the commandments and their respective statutes and judgments in Galatians 3 or one must admit that heaven and earth have passed away - or that both Yeshua and Paul did not know what they were talking about. As we will see, Galatians 3 is one of the keys to correctly understanding what was and was not fulfilled and abolished under the New Covenant.

Does Galatians 3 declare that the commandments, statutes, and judgments have been abolished by faith in Yeshua? In verses 16 and 17, Paul identifies the law to which he was referring. He first referenced the promises given to Abraham and then contrasted them with "...the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after...." In verse19, Paul continued, "Wherefore then ... the law? It was added because of transgressions...." Paul identified the law in Galatians 3 as a law that was added four hundred and thirty years after the promises were given to Abraham. Four hundred and thirty years after Abraham, the Israelites were camped at Mt. Sinai. Consequently, only that which was added at Mt. Sinai was abolished when faith came. In other words, anything in existence prior to the covenant consummated at Mt. Sinai cannot be that which was added at Mt. Sinai and later abolished by Yeshua.

Prior Existence of Yahweh's Laws

Most Christians are unaware that Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments existed long before their codification at Mt. Sinai - although this should be self-evident. Unlike man, whose ethics change almost as often as the tides of the ocean, Yahweh is not fickle. His morality is constant and reliable, and because His morality is the same yesterday, today, and forever, His moral laws have not changed one iota.

The Bible provides pre-Sinai evidence that Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments were already in existence and, therefore, could not have been added at Mt. Sinai. For example, Abraham kept Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and laws - which were later codified by Moses:

...Abraham obeyed my [Yahweh's] voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws. (Genesis 26:5)

The book of Jasher11 expounds upon Abraham's law observance:

...Abram served the Lord his God all the days of his life, and he walked in His ways and followed His law. (Jasher 12:42)

Later in the same book, Abraham reminded his son Isaac of Yahweh's law:

...He [Yahweh] said unto me, to thy seed I will give all these lands, and they shall inherit them when they keep my commandments, my statutes and my judgments that I have commanded thee [Isaac], and which I shall command them. Now therefore my son, hearken to my voice, and keep the commandments of the Lord thy God ... that it may be well with thee and thy children forever. ...teach then thy children and thy seed the instruction of the Lord and His commandments. (Jasher 26:24-26)

This is very similar to what we find in Genesis 18:

For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of YHWH, to do justice and judgment [righteousness and justice, NASB]; that YHWH may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him. (Genesis 18:19)

Righteousness and justice are only found in Yahweh's morality as delineated in His commandments, statutes, and laws (Genesis 26:5). The structure of Yahweh's moral law as three integral components - commandments, statutes, and judgments, which Abraham admonished Isaac to keep over 500 years prior to Moses in Jasher 26:24 - is the same structure of Yahweh's moral law that Moses provided in the Pentateuch:

Now these are the commandments, the statutes, and the judgments, which YHWH your God commanded to teach you.... (Deuteronomy 6:1)

No written testimony of the commandments, statutes, and judgments in their entirety exists before Mt. Sinai, but they were nonetheless in existence.12 They were verbally imparted from generation to generation, from Adam to Seth to Noah to Shem and on to their progeny.

Because of Transgressions

Paul provides additional proof that Yahweh's law was in existence prior to Mt. Sinai when he declared that the Mosaic Covenant was "added because of transgressions" that occurred during the previous pre-Mosaic dispensation. The Apostle John defines sin as a transgression of Yahweh's law:

...whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. (1 John 3:4)

The sins alluded to by Paul in Galatians 3 were transgressions of Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments during the period between Adam and Moses. Where there is no law there can be no transgression; therefore, the moral laws of Yahweh had to have existed prior to Mt. Sinai:

Therefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: (For until the law [as given and codified by Moses] sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression.... (Romans 5:12-14)

The Added Law

If Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments were not the law Paul alluded to in Galatians 3, then to what law was he referring? Hebrews 7:19-22 uses the words "covenant" and "law" interchangeably. Although made up of other individual laws, a covenant is a law itself, only more comprehensive in its scope and application.

Galatians 3:19 refers to two different laws: one that existed prior to Mt. Sinai (the one the Hebrews transgressed) and the one added at Mt. Sinai. Verse 19 is correctly interpreted in the following fashion:

Wherefore then serveth the law [Mosaic Covenant]? It was added because of transgressions [of Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments during the Abrahamic Covenant].... (Galatians 3:19)

Because Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments were not the law that was added at Mt. Sinai, they could not have been abolished by Yeshua under the New Covenant. The Mosaic Covenant was the law that was added at Mt. Sinai. Thus, the Mosaic Covenant was the schoolmaster (mentioned in Galatians 3:24) that was abolished when Yeshua sacrificed Himself in payment for our sins.

Many contemporary Christians have chosen to believe the Old Covenant law was superceded by a "higher" New Covenant law. Although the New Covenant did supercede the Old Covenant (Hebrews 7:22, 8:6-7), it does not supercede the Old Covenant canon because the laws are one and the same. There are two different covenants, and one replaced the other, but there is only one law.

What Exactly?

What exactly was added to the existing commandments, statutes, and judgments four-hundred and thirty years after the promises were given to Abraham? The Mosaic Covenant - including the Levitical priesthood, obligatory compliance to Yahweh's already existing commandments, statutes, and judgments, and animal sacrifices for justification - was added at Mt. Sinai and abolished at the cross. Under the New Covenant, Yeshua is our high priest, our sacrifice, and our justification. He fulfilled all that was added at Mt. Sinai. But His perfect fulfillment does not mean we are now free to steal, rape, and murder. Nor does it absolve His subjects from pursuing His perfect laws in every aspect of society.

Compulsory vs. Voluntary Compliance

The major difference between the Mosaic and Abrahamic Covenants was compulsory versus voluntary compliance. Paul wrote to the Galatian Christians that the law - the Mosaic Covenant - was added because of Israel's transgressions. Because the Israelites did not love Yahweh and their fellow man enough to freely comply with the moral laws in existence under the Adamic and Abrahamic Covenants, Yahweh put them under a compulsory compliance - that is, "in custody" (Galatians 3:23 NASB) - by way of the Mosaic Covenant. Under that Covenant, the Israelites were compelled to keep His laws in order to be justified before God. Moses explained it in the following fashion:

...it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before YHWH our God, as he hath commanded us. (Deuteronomy 6:25)

It was this compulsory compliance for righteousness that Yeshua abolished:

...Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. (Romans 10:4)

Paul did not say that Yeshua was the end of the law period, but rather that He was the end of the law (or covenant) for righteousness. This is the same as saying Yeshua was the end of the Mosaic Covenant.

Contrast Deuteronomy 4:13 with Hebrews 8:8-10:

And he [Yahweh] declared unto you [Israel] his [Mosaic] covenant, which he commanded you to perform, even ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone. (Deuteronomy 4:13)

...Behold, the days come, saith YHWH, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.... For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith YHWH; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts.... (Hebrews 8:8-10)

In these passages, stones represent compulsory compliance and hearts represent voluntary compliance. Under the Mosaic Covenant, the Israelites were compelled to keep the commandments, statutes, and judgments, which had been written on stone. Under the Abrahamic and Christian Covenants (which are essentially the same), those same commandments, statutes, and judgments, written on our hearts and minds, were and are obeyed voluntarily. In Romans 7:6, Paul described the difference as serving Yahweh in the spirit rather than the letter of the law. This does not mean that Yahweh's perfect laws have been abolished. In fact, Yeshua's Sermon on the Mount reveals that the spirit of the law demands an even higher standard.

Through Yeshua's sacrifice and resurrection, the New Covenant reestablished Yahweh's law as it was intended to have been observed under the Abrahamic Covenant. From the beginning, Yahweh's intention has been for His people to voluntarily keep the commandments, statutes, and judgments. New Covenant Christians are empowered by Yahweh's indwelling Spirit to do what was impossible under the Mosaic Covenant, without His indwelling Spirit:

That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.... Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you.... (Romans 8:4-9)

Although obedience is voluntary under the New Covenant, anyone who does not obey Yahweh's laws is nevertheless carnal and at enmity with Him. Such a person does not love Yahweh, as demonstrated by his refusal to obey His laws.

The Mosaic Covenant was added because of Israel's transgressions "til the seed [Yeshua] should come." He has come and the Mosaic Covenant - not Yahweh's perfect law - has been abolished. Why, after all, would Yahweh abolish that which was perfect in the first place?

Perfection

Anyone who has studied Yahweh's laws knows how perfect they truly are. Regrettably, few Christians today - having been persuaded by antinomian pastors that the laws are no longer applicable - have taken the time to do so.

The rewards of meditating upon and observing His laws are too manifold to enumerate in this chapter,13 but consider the following:

Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of YHWH; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper. (Psalm 1:1-3)

O how love I thy law! It is my meditation all the day. Thou through thy commandments hast made me wiser than mine enemies: for they are ever with me. I have more understanding than all my teachers: for thy testimonies are my meditation. I understand more than the ancients, because I keep thy precepts. (Psalm 119:97-100)

Why would anyone in their right mind abandon the blessings mentioned in these two passages alone? Those who would do so are not in their right mind:

I have written to him the great things of my law, but they were counted as a strange thing. (Hosea 8:12)

The Perfect Law of Liberty

...whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed. (James 1:25)

The law of liberty referred to by James is the same law of liberty the Psalmist wrote about:

The law of YHWH is perfect, converting the soul.... (Psalm 19:7)

So shall I keep thy law continually for ever and ever. And I will walk at liberty.... (Psalm 119:44-45)

If applied today, Yahweh's law would set us at liberty. However, liberty must not be confused with freedom from our sins. Only Yeshua's blood-atoning sacrifice can accomplish the latter. Nevertheless, the implementation of Yahweh's perfect law of liberty would resolve every single problem facing America today. His law would liberate us from all of the following immoral and oppressive conditions:

  • Unchecked crime and immorality
  • Infanticide14
  • Repressive government and crooked politicians
  • A criminal justice system15
  • Corrupt justices
  • Crooked lawyers
  • Rigged juries
  • Election fraud
  • Special interest groups
  • Bureaucratic entanglements
  • Licenses and permits
  • Gun control16
  • Prisons and their exorbitant costs and myriad problems17
  • A fraudulent economic and banking system18
  • The Federal Reserve
  • Oppressive taxation
  • The Internal Revenue Service
  • Eminent domain
  • A socialistic welfare system
  • An unethical insurance system
  • Unlawful immigration19
  • Multiculturalism, pluralism, and polytheism

All of this and much more would be eradicated with the implementation of Yahweh's laws. The Psalmist informed us that "the law of Yahweh is perfect" and "in keeping [it] there is great reward" - Psalm 19:7-11. Why then do today's Christians want to forfeit the perfect, never-changing, infallible law of Yahweh for man's imperfect, ever-changing, fallible laws? For example, Pastor Chuck Baldwin (the Constitution Party's 2008 presidential candidate) made the following appeal for a more pure Constitutionalism in his July 10, 2007, Internet commentary entitled "Can You Imagine This Country?":

Can you imagine a nation without the I.R.S.? Can you imagine a nation with little crime and where children were free to pray in schools? Can you imagine a nation where the father's income was able to adequately provide for his household? Can you imagine a country with low divorce rates and where virtually everyone with a high school diploma could both read and write and was capable of earning his or her way in society?

Can you imagine a nation without an A.C.L.U. or a N.E.A.? Can you imagine a country that did not legally murder its own unborn children and that would not pander to sexual deviants or criminals? Can you imagine a country that did not glorify, much less sponsor, gambling? Can you imagine a nation with strong state governments and a limited federal government?

Can you imagine a country where you could order a firearm through a catalog and where there was no such thing as a B.A.T.F.? Well, you might not be able to imagine such a country, but that was the kind of nation our founders dreamed about, fought for, and bequeathed to their posterity.

Unfortunately, since World War II, we Americans have seemed willing to squander the sacrifice and repudiate the principles of our ancestors. With the way things are going, can you imagine what this nation will look like in another 50 years?20

Why would we want to return to the document that created this mess? A document that Benjamin Franklin predicted (just before signing it on September 17, 1784, the last day of the Constitutional Convention) "[it] can only end in Despotism"?21

Other than Baldwin's mention of public schools and state and national government, everything he offered is attainable through Yahweh's law - and with no government interference.

Antinomian pastors are often heard describing Yahweh's laws as burdensome and impractical. If this were true, why would King David and the Apostle Paul declare that they delighted in His laws?

Teach me, O YHWH, the way of thy statutes; and I shall keep it unto the end. Give me understanding, and I shall keep thy law; yea, I shall observe it with my whole heart. Make me to go in the path of thy commandments; for therein do I delight. (Psalm 119:33-35)

For I delight in the law of God after the inward man.... So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God.... (Romans 7:22, 25)

Were David, a man after Yahweh's own heart, and Paul, who had been specially chosen and trained by Yahweh, out of touch with reality? Both of these men understood the perfection of Yahweh's laws and the rewards gained by those who delight in them:

Blessed is the man that feareth YHWH, that delighteth greatly in his commandments. His seed shall be mighty upon earth: the generation of the upright shall be blessed. Wealth and riches shall be in his house: and his righteousness endureth for ever. (Psalm 112:1-3)

Today's Christians need to decide whom they are going to believe: antinomian prevaricators who preach that Yahweh's laws are burdensome or the Apostle John:

By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous [burdensome, NASB]. (1 John 5:2-3)

If America's federal regulations had been issued on stone at the time of Moses, he would have needed beasts of burden and hundreds of carts to haul them down from Mt. Sinai. As King Solomon wrote in Proverbs 13:15, it is not the laws of Yahweh that are difficult, but rather the way of the transgressor.

In John 8:36, Yeshua informed us that "if the Son therefore shall make [us] free, [we] shall be free indeed." This freedom begins with salvation in Yeshua and is developed and preserved by His perfect law of liberty.

It is a sad commentary that the majority of Christianity, while giving lip service to Psalm 19:7, do not really believe it at all. If they did, they would relentlessly pursue Yahweh's perfect laws in their personal lives, the lives of their families, their churches, their immediate communities, and on a national level. This is not to say that I favor federal government. Instead, I am referring to a theocratic government on the local level throughout what is presently known as the United States of America. After this is accomplished, we can look to the entire North American continent and beyond.

Yahweh's All-Sufficient Laws

People who do not believe Psalm 19:7 do not believe in 2 Timothy 3:16-17 either:

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. (2 Timothy 3:16-17)

Many Christians believe the first half of verse 16, but they do not believe the second half and especially not verse 17. It is important to note that when Paul wrote "all scripture is given by inspiration of God," very little of the New Testament had yet been written. Paul was referring to the Old Testament. The inspired laws of Yahweh, in particular, are profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in righteousness so that a man of God or a society of godly men might be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works:

Blessed is the man whom thou chastenest [instructs, NKJV], O YHWH, and teachest him out of thy law. (Psalm 94:12)

Only a perfect God, through a perfect Savior, and by perfect laws, can produce perfect men. Why would we need or want a man-made constitution governing our people - especially one that is so often found to contradict Yahweh's Constitution - His commandments, statutes, and judgments?

I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him. (Ecclesiastes 3:14)

Yahweh's law is all-sufficient both for us as individuals and for our entire government. A society is but a group of individuals. What is all-sufficient for us as individuals is also all-sufficient for us as a group of individuals. Yahweh's perfect laws are our means of implementing His Kingdom here on earth as it is in heaven. To reject Yahweh's law as inapplicable to any facet of society is equivalent to rejecting not only Yahweh's Kingdom, but Yahweh Himself as Sovereign and King. R.J. Rushdoony pointed out "God cannot be robbed of sovereignty at one point without soon being denied sovereignty at all points."22

To seek Yahweh is to seek His Kingdom, and to seek His Kingdom is to seek His law:

...should not a people seek unto their God? ...To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them. (Isaiah 8:19-20)

Only Yahweh's laws are perfect. Consequently, everything - including the United States Constitution - must be measured by this standard. Anything to the contrary is imperfect.

Most Constitutionalists base their Christian appraisal of the Constitution on the framers' well-worn quotations (which often lack primary source documentation) and from a few Supreme Court declarations made years later. Many Constitutionalists claim that the Constitution reflects the teaching of Scripture, but never have I read or heard anyone provide anything from the Constitution itself to demonstrate that it is a Christian or biblical document. In fact, it is quite the opposite. Furthermore, the fruits of the Constitution reflect its full measure.

While there may not be many at this time who share these sentiments, more and more people are recognizing the rotten fruit of the Constitution and speaking out. After I had preached several messages in the audio series that inspired this book, Yahweh led me to the book Political Polytheism: The Myth of Pluralism by Gary North. This book extensively documents much of the true history of America's foundations, including the little-known religious and social beliefs of the Constitutional framers at the time of the Constitutional Convention. North proves that the framers had neither Christianity nor the Kingdom of Yahweh in mind when they crafted the Constitution:

There is no escape from this conclusion: the United States Constitution is an atheistic, humanistic covenant.... The Constitution is not a Christian covenant document.... While there have been many attempts over the years by Christians to evade this conclusion, they have all been unsupported with primary source documents....23

What the framers, at any given time, said regarding their beliefs or lack thereof, is just as irrelevant as Aaron naming the golden calf "Yahweh" in Exodus 32:5. Their legacy - the Constitution - speaks for itself. What historians and politicians have said about the Constitution over the past two hundred years proves nothing. The Constitution must be assessed by the perfect laws of Yahweh; on this standard alone, it stand or falls as a Christian document. I have challenged Constitutionalists to provide me with evidence from the Constitution demonstrating it is a biblically-based document. To date, no one has been able to offer any proof for the simple reason that the United States Constitution is devoid of any biblical references and even conflicts with Yahweh's law.

In some of the ensuing chapters, we will be examining the United States Constitution article by article and amendment by amendment in light of the Yahweh's perfect laws. Lord willing, it should prove unique in determining the biblical legitimacy of the United States Constitution.


End Notes

1. Not everyone claiming to be a Christian has been properly instructed in the biblical plan of salvation. Mark 16:15-16; Acts 2:36-41, 22:1-16; Romans 6:3-4; Galatians 3:26-27; Colossians 2:11-13; and 1 Peter 3:21 should be studied to understand what is required to be covered by the blood of Yeshua and forgiven of your sins. For a more thorough explanation concerning baptism and its relationship to salvation, "Baptism by the Scriptures" and "Fifty Objections to Baptism Answered" may be read online, or the book Baptism: All You Wanted to Know and More may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for free.

2. YHWH (most often pronounced Yahweh) is the English transliteration of the Tetragrammaton, the principal Hebrew name of the God of the Bible. For a more thorough explanation concerning the use of the names of God, "The Third Commandment" may be read online, or the book Thou shalt not take the name of YHWH thy God in vain may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, 69363, for a suggested $4 donation.*

3. Yeshua is the English transliteration of our Savior's given Hebrew name. For a more thorough explanation concerning the use of the names of God, "The Third Commandment" may be read online, or the book Thou shalt not take the name of YHWH thy God in vain may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for a suggested $4 donation.*

4. All Scripture is quoted from the King James Version unless otherwise noted. Portions of Scripture have been omitted for brevity's sake. If there are questions regarding any passage, please open your Bible and study the text to ensure it has been properly used.

5. Where the Tetragrammaton (YHWH) - the four Hebrew characters that represent the personal name of God - has been unlawfully rendered the LORD or GOD in English translations, I have taken the liberty to correct this error by inserting YHWH where appropriate. For a more thorough explanation concerning the use of the names of God, "The Third Commandment" may be read online, or the book Thou shalt not take the name of YHWH thy God in vain may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, 69363, for a suggested $4 donation.*

6. Even many alleged pronomians are, at best, two-thirds pronomian - that is, they are interested in restoring Yahweh's commandments and statutes, but not His judgments.

7. Not only do most "New Testament Christians" reject the law component of the New Covenant, they also either ignore or dismiss the importance of whom Yahweh declared He would make His New Covenant with. For a more thorough explanation on the "who" of the New Covenant, the book The Mystery of the Gentiles: Who Are They and Where Are They Now? may be read online or ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska, 69363, for a suggested $10 donation.*

8. Belief alone does not make justification in Yeshua a reality. Biblical faith is all encompassing and entails more than simply belief. Mark 16:15-16; Acts 2:36-41, 22:1-16; Romans 6:3-4; Galatians 3:26-27; Colossians 2:11-13; and 1 Peter 3:21 should be studied in order to understand what is required to be covered by the blood of Yeshua and forgiven of your sins. For a more thorough explanation concerning baptism and its relationship to salvation, "Baptism by the Scriptures" and "Fifty Objections to Baptism Answered" may be read online, or the book Baptism: All You Wanted to Know and More may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for free.

9. Noah Webster, American Dictionary of the English Language, s.v. "Licentious" (1828; reprint ed. San Francisco, CA: The Foundation for American Christian Education, 1967).

10. Webster, "Licentiousness."

11. Although Jasher is not a part of canonized Scripture, it is cited in Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18 and referenced in 2 Timothy 3:8.

12. See Appendix 1 for a list of specific pre-Sinai citations of Yahweh's law.

13. See Appendix 2 for a more exhaustive list of Scriptures enumerating the blessings resulting from Yahweh's law.

14. For more regarding infanticide, "The Sixth Commandment" may be read online, or the book Thou shalt not kill may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for a suggested $4 donation.*

15. For more regarding the United States criminal justice system, "The Eighth Commandment" may be read online, or the book Thou shalt not steal may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for a suggested $4 donation.*

16. By employing the term "assault weapons," the anti-gun lobby deceptively attempts to associate all gun owners with criminal behavior. "Firearms: Scripturally Defended," a treatise on the biblical mandate to be armed, may be read online.

17. The book Prisons: Shut Them All Down! may be read online or ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for a suggested $3 donation.*

18. For more on the fraudulent economic and banking system, oppressive taxation, government-controlled welfare, eminent domain, and the unethical insurance system, "The Eighth Commandment" may be read online, or the book Thou shalt not steal may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for a suggested $4 donation.*

19. For more on unlawful immigration and multiculturalism, "The Seventh Commandment" and "The Eighth Commandment" may be read online, or the books Thou shalt not commit adultery and Thou shalt not steal may be ordered from Mission to Israel Ministries, PO Box 248, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363, for a suggested $6 donation each.*

20. Chuck Baldwin, "Can You Imagine This Country?" Chuck-Wagon Email Commentary, July 10, 2007, <http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/>.

21. Benjamin Franklin, Ormond Seavey, ed., "Speech in the Constitutional Convention at the Conclusion of it Deliberations," Autobiography and Other Writings (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 1998) p. 350.

22. Rousas John Rushdoony, Sovereignty (Vallecito, CA: Ross House Books, 2007) p. v.

23. Gary North, Political Polytheism: The Myth of Pluralism (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989) pp. 403-04.

*We are admonished in Matthew 10:8 "freely ye have received, freely give." Although there is a suggested price for our books, we do not sell them. In keeping with 2 Corinthians 9:7, this ministry is supported by freewill offerings. If you cannot afford the suggested price, inform us of your situation, and we will be pleased to provide you with whatever you need for whatever you can send.



Link to site http://www.missiontoisrael.org/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt1.php
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (158)  
Tagged with: Religion, truth, God, USA, Consitution, Law

Journey to Truth

Posted on Feb 2nd, 2009 by Faith : Wild Child Faith
 Every week I will be posting from now on articles and stories I find across the internet or from books I read that are true and I believe people need to know to protect that which we hold dear. Things from pastors I have found and turst what they find by doing my own studies and checking to see if what they say is true. I believe most of it is.
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (47)  
Tagged with: Religion, truth, God

Companion

Posted on Apr 30th, 2008 by Faith : Wild Child Faith
Today I found a companion. He is shy right now since he does not know me well. He is a black and orange male guinea pig adopted from the humane society. I have named him Bear, or rather my friend gave him that name for me. I believe as he grows to love his new home with me his true personality will shine forth to match his given name.

I am so happy to have someone else to share my home with. Just earlier that day only minutes before he came over I had been thinking on how I had wanted one to share my home with. When I first saw him I fell in love with him. Though, the state the last owner had left him in was that of a different matter. It is shocking to me on how some people take an animal in to their family and then abandon them only shortly after. Tomorrow he gets to go to the vet for a check up to make sure his health is good. I dearly hope so. I would hate for my new found family member to be sick.
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (74)  
Tagged with: companion, guinea pig

Challenge

Posted on Apr 25th, 2008 by Faith : Wild Child Faith

I have a little of a challenge for those here. It is a simple question I like to ask others and it has never secced to amuse me on what the answers are and why they chose that answer to this question.

If you could use only one word to discribe your life what word would it be? Why that word?


For those that respond I can not wait to see what your answer is.
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (47)  
Tagged with: challenge, question, life.

Hello

Posted on Apr 25th, 2008 by Faith : Wild Child Faith
Hello everyone that come to this page and sees this blog. I am new to this site and on a lot of things that I am doing now with my life. beginning a new in a new place all on your own is a trying thing to do. It is something though that I am glad I did.  I was always raised to follow what your heart and soul tell you to do as long as it made sense. I guess I learned to follow the first part of what they said, but the second has been some thing my heart and soul as never understood. The path they always wanted to follow was the most dangerous and trying one in-front of me. Each time I chose that path I was happy and at peace with myself. While, everyone else I knew wrung their hands in worry about my safety.

This area will be using to post stories of things that go on around me. Poem and stories that I write or find and wish to share on here. For those that read this I can not say they will be good to others standards. To me though these are things that are close to me and hold importance to me and those that I care about.

I hope all that read this will enjoy it and please please leave any type of comments on the things entered into this small area of the world wide web.
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (38)  
Tagged with: life, starting